Abstract
Field studies carried out in Andhra Pradesh, India, in 1978-83 showed that attack by Helicoverpa armigera on sorghum was intensive during the rainy season, larvae damaging the developing grains. Fourteen parasitoids, a mermithid nematode and 6 predators were recorded from H. armigera. Rates of parasitism higher than 50% were commonly recorded in eggs and larvae. Rates of infestation and parasitism did not differ between sorghum as a monoculture and intercropped with pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan]. Natural enemies were more active on alfisols than on vertisols. The results are discussed in relation to the management of H. armigera on sorghum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Helicoverpa armigera attack on sorghum was intensive during the rainy season and damaged developing grains.
- Organ / stage
- developing grainse0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- attack by Helicoverpa armigerae0
- Qualifier
- during the rainy seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“attack by Helicoverpa armigera on sorghum was intensive during the rainy season, larvae damaging the developing grains”
Claim · model-written summary
Fourteen parasitoids, a mermithid nematode and six predators were recorded from H. armigera.
- Interactor
- H. armigera
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- Fourteen parasitoids, a mermithid nematode and 6 predatorse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fourteen parasitoids, a mermithid nematode and 6 predators were recorded from H. armigera”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Egg and larval parasitism of H. armigera commonly exceeded 50%.
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa
Helicoverpat0pest - Outcome
- Rates of parasitisme0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 50%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Rates of parasitism higher than 50% were commonly recorded in eggs and larvae”
t0“Helicoverpa on sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Infestation did not differ between sorghum monoculture and intercropping with pigeon pea.
- Treatment
- intercropped with pigeon peae0
- Interactor
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- Rates of infestatione0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- sorghum as a monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Rates of infestation and parasitism did not differ between sorghum as a monoculture and intercropped with pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan]”
Claim · model-written summary
Parasitism did not differ between sorghum monoculture and intercropping with pigeon pea.
- Treatment
- intercropped with pigeon peae0
- Interactor
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- parasitisme0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- sorghum as a monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Rates of infestation and parasitism did not differ between sorghum as a monoculture and intercropped with pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan]”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural enemies were more active on alfisols than on vertisols.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Natural enemies were more active on alfisols than on vertisols”
t0“sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.