Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Infestation did not differ between sorghum monoculture and intercropping with pigeon pea.

A claim from Helicoverpa on sorghum · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation did not differ between sorghum monoculture and intercropping with pigeon pea.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropped with pigeon peae0
Interactor
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
Rates of infestatione0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
sorghum as a monoculturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates of infestation and parasitism did not differ between sorghum as a monoculture and intercropped with pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–497

Title

Helicoverpa on sorghum

C S Pawar; V. S. Bhatnagar; Deepak R. Jadhav Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) 1989

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-1992869ca8fa73e8ba652f48fabdfdf77c0290b991f29e9354c0773567f75bae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.