Abstract
Fruit yield is representing the most important research objectiv because it determines plantation economical efficiency. In the present experience were analyzed yield between 2006 and 2007 of some apricot tree varieties on which we applied cutting in green at different moments of offspring growth: 25 of May, 15 of June, 10 of July. Yield /tree in 2006 is situated between 30,7 kg in case of Litoral variety in Uncat variant and 40,4 kg in case of Mamaia variety in Cut in 15 of June. Statistically speaking almost all varieties registered distinctive significanthy differences given the control in Cut at 15 of June plot. Dacia variety, in the some plot had nesignificanthy differences concerning yield. The most productive varieties in 2006 were Mamaia, Sulina and Olimp varieties. Relative yield is situated between 102,5 % in case of Traian variety in Uncut varient in 25 of May and 125,6 % in case of Sulina variety in Cut at 15 of June variant, which proves that yield amplitude between varieties and variants is not so big. As concerns fruits yield in 2007, this was situated between 10,4 t/ha in case of Dacia variety in Uncut variety in Cut at 15 of June variant. Analysing all obtained data as concerns yield, the best cutting variant was Cut at 15 of June variant, which registered in case of the majority of studied varieties significanthy positive differences given the control Uncut. Analysing yield on two years of research we can conclude that studied varieties have a high productivity potential, when climate accidents didn’t appear and if upon trees have beel applied necessary agrophy totechnical measures, and as concerns cuttings in green appliance upon trees we can assert that it in was resistered a plus of value in cuttings in green variant in comparison with the Uncut variant. Besides all this we can not say that cuttings in green influence applied on trees in different moments of offspring growth have had spectacular effects upon yield. Still, is recomended dry cuttings replacement with cuttings in green.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Litoral in the uncut treatment yielded 30,7 kg per tree in 2006.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREE
Prunus armeniacat0 - Material
- Litorale0
- Treatment
- Uncat variante0
- Outcome
- Yield /treee0
- Value
- 30,7 kge0
- Qualifier
- 2006e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“Yield /tree in 2006 is situated between 30,7 kg in case of Litoral variety in Uncat variant and 40,4 kg in case of Mamaia variety in Cut in 15 of June”
Claim · model-written summary
Mamaia yielded 40,4 kg per tree after cutting on 15 June in 2006.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Material
- Mamaiae0
- Treatment
- Cut in 15 of Junee0
- Outcome
- Yield /treee0
- Value
- 40,4 kge0
- Qualifier
- 2006e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“Yield /tree in 2006 is situated between 30,7 kg in case of Litoral variety in Uncat variant and 40,4 kg in case of Mamaia variety in Cut in 15 of June”
Claim · model-written summary
Most varieties showed significantly different yield from control after cutting on 15 June.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- Cut at 15 of Junee0
- Outcome
- differencese0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“almost all varieties registered distinctive significanthy differences given the control in Cut at 15 of June plot”
Claim · model-written summary
Dacia yield did not differ significantly in that plot.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Material
- Daciae0
- Treatment
- some plote0
- Outcome
- yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“Dacia variety, in the some plot had nesignificanthy differences concerning yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Mamaia, Sulina and Olimp were the most productive in 2006.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Outcome
- most productive varietiese0
- Direction
- most productivee0
- Qualifier
- 2006e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“The most productive varieties in 2006 were Mamaia, Sulina and Olimp varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Traian uncut on 25 May had relative yield of 102,5 %.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Material
- Traiane0
- Treatment
- Uncut variente0
- Outcome
- Relative yielde0
- Value
- 102,5 %e0
- Qualifier
- 25 of Maye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“Relative yield is situated between 102,5 % in case of Traian variety in Uncut varient in 25 of May”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulina cut on 15 June had relative yield of 125,6 %.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Material
- Sulinae0
- Treatment
- Cut at 15 of Junee0
- Outcome
- Relative yielde1
- Value
- 125,6 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“125,6 % in case of Sulina variety in Cut at 15 of June variant”
e1“Relative yield is situated between”
Claim · model-written summary
Dacia uncut in the 15 June variant yielded 10,4 t/ha in 2007.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Material
- Daciae0
- Treatment
- Uncut varietye0
- Outcome
- fruits yielde0
- Value
- 10,4 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2007e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“fruits yield in 2007, this was situated between 10,4 t/ha in case of Dacia variety in Uncut variety in Cut at 15 of June variant”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting on 15 June was the best cutting variant for yield.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- Cut at 15 of Junee0
- Outcome
- best cutting variante0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“the best cutting variant was Cut at 15 of June variant”
Claim · model-written summary
Most varieties had significantly positive yield differences under 15 June cutting versus uncut.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- Cut at 15 of Junee1
- Outcome
- differencese0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Comparator
- Uncute0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“majority of studied varieties significanthy positive differences given the control Uncut”
e1“best cutting variant was Cut at 15 of June variant”
Claim · model-written summary
Green cutting increased yield relative to uncut treatment, but effects were not spectacular.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- cuttings in greene0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- plus of valuee0
- Qualifier
- can not say that cuttings in green influence applied on trees in different moments of offspring growth have had spectacular effectse1
- Comparator
- Uncut variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“a plus of value in cuttings in green variant in comparison with the Uncut variant”
e1“can not say that cuttings in green influence applied on trees in different moments of offspring growth have had spectacular effects upon yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend replacing dry cuttings with green cuttings.
- Taxon
- APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
- Outcome
- dry cuttings replacement with cuttings in greene0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“APRICOT TREE”
e0“is recomended dry cuttings replacement with cuttings in green”