Paper · 2009

Effect of stem and fruit pruning on yield and quality of hydroponically grown tomato.

Martin Makgose Maboko; C.P. Du Plooy; J. S. Tenywa; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response of hydroponically grown tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) to stem and fruit pruning was investigated in a shade net structure. Plants were pruned to either one or two stems, with three fruit pruning treatments (six or four fruits per truss, as well as no fruit removal). Plants pruned to two stems resulted in a significant increase in total and marketable yield, with a decrease in unmarketable yield. Although the fruit pruning treatments had no significant effect on marketable yield, zero fruit pruning increased the total number and mass of small fruits. Plants pruned to two stems yielded a higher number of fruits per plant, while the competition for assimilates lead to reduced fruit size. The increased incidence of cracking with the single stem pruning can be related to the larger fruit size obtained with this treatment. The study demonstrated that yield and fruit size can be effectively manipulated by stem pruning, while fruit pruning has only a limited effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning significantly increased total yield.

Treatment
pruned to two stemse0
Outcome
total and marketable yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
onee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants pruned to two stems resulted in a significant increase in total and marketable yield, with a decrease in unmarketable yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“either one or two stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning significantly increased marketable yield.

Treatment
pruned to two stemse0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
onee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants pruned to two stems resulted in a significant increase in total and marketable yield, with a decrease in unmarketable yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“either one or two stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning reduced unmarketable yield.

Treatment
pruned to two stemse0
Outcome
unmarketable yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
onee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants pruned to two stems resulted in a significant increase in total and marketable yield, with a decrease in unmarketable yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“either one or two stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pruning did not significantly affect marketable yield.

Treatment
fruit pruning treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit pruning treatments had no significant effect on marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No fruit pruning increased the number of small fruits.

Treatment
zero fruit pruninge0
Outcome
total numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero fruit pruning increased the total number and mass of small fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No fruit pruning increased the mass of small fruits.

Treatment
zero fruit pruninge0
Outcome
mass of small fruitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero fruit pruning increased the total number and mass of small fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning produced more fruit per plant.

Treatment
pruned to two stemse0
Outcome
number of fruits per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants pruned to two stems yielded a higher number of fruits per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition for assimilates under two-stem pruning reduced fruit size.

Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
competition for assimilatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the competition for assimilates lead to reduced fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-stem pruning increased cracking incidence.

Treatment
single stem pruninge0
Outcome
incidence of crackinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased incidence of cracking with the single stem pruning can be related to the larger fruit size obtained with this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger fruit size may explain increased cracking under single-stem pruning.

Treatment
single stem pruninge0
Outcome
incidence of crackinge0
Qualifier
larger fruit sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased incidence of cracking with the single stem pruning can be related to the larger fruit size obtained with this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

72 papers: 53 positive, 19 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

pruning · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.