Paper · 2007

EFFECT OF SPACING AND STEM PRUNING ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO

Neelam Ara; M. K. Bashar; Sumera Begum; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
65
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ara, N., Bashar, M.K., Begum, S. and Kakon, S.S. 2007. Effect of Spacing and Stem Pruning on the Growth and Yield of Tomato. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2(3): 35-39 The effect of spacing (40 and 50cm) and stem pruning (one stem, two stem, three stem and no pruning) on the yield was evaluated on indeterminate type BARI Tomato-6 variety at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Ishurdi, Pabna during 2005-2006. Wider spacing (50cm) gave the higher marketable yield (82.39 t/ha) and closer spacing gave the lowest marketable yield (68.32 t/ha) and number of fruits/plant. Two stem pruning yielded the highest marketable yield (87.18 t/ha) and one stem pruning gave the lowest number of fruits/plant. But stem pruning also yielded the lowest marketable weight of fruits/plant. Wider spacing coupled with two stem pruning showed superior interaction (97.08 t/ha) to others.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty centimeter spacing produced higher marketable tomato yield of 82.39 t/ha.

Treatment
Wider spacing (50cm)e0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
82.39 t/hae0
Comparator
closer spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing (50cm) gave the higher marketable yield (82.39 t/ha) and closer spacing gave the lowest marketable yield (68.32 t/ha) and number of fruits/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing produced the lowest marketable tomato yield of 68.32 t/ha.

Treatment
closer spacinge0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
68.32 t/hae0
Comparator
Wider spacing (50cm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing (50cm) gave the higher marketable yield (82.39 t/ha) and closer spacing gave the lowest marketable yield (68.32 t/ha) and number of fruits/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing gave the lowest fruit number per tomato plant.

Treatment
closer spacinge0
Outcome
number of fruits/plante0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“closer spacing gave the lowest marketable yield (68.32 t/ha) and number of fruits/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stem pruning produced the highest marketable yield, 87.18 t/ha.

Treatment
Two stem pruninge0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
87.18 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two stem pruning yielded the highest marketable yield (87.18 t/ha) and one stem pruning gave the lowest number of fruits/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One stem pruning gave the lowest number of tomato fruits per plant.

Treatment
one stem pruninge0
Outcome
number of fruits/plante0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one stem pruning gave the lowest number of fruits/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem pruning produced the lowest marketable weight of fruits per tomato plant.

Treatment
stem pruninge0
Outcome
marketable weight of fruits/plante0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem pruning also yielded the lowest marketable weight of fruits/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing combined with two stem pruning had the superior tomato yield of 97.08 t/ha.

Treatment
Wider spacing coupled with two stem pruninge0
Outcome
superior interactione0
Direction
superiore0
Value
97.08 t/hae0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing coupled with two stem pruning showed superior interaction (97.08 t/ha) to others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

72 papers: 53 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

density · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 48 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.