Abstract
[Objective]This study aimed to screen out the best model for sugarcane intercropped with soybean in order to provide reference for the commercial production of sugarcane intercropped with soybean. [Method]Using Guichun 8 and Guitang 29 as the soybean and sugarcane intercropping cultivars, under experiments with different intercropping patterns (sugarcane spacing was between 1 m of conventional row spacing and 1.2-1.4 m of width spacing, and the soybean intercropping row number was set at 0, 1, and 2 rows), the growth, yield traits, and yield index of both sugarcane and soybean were investigated and analyzed. [Result]After the sugarcane intercropped with soybean, the tillering rate and effective stalk number of sugarcane decreased. The effects of intercropping on the stalk diameter and plant height of sugarcane were insignificant, which, under suitable sugarcane spacing (1.4 m), would not cause the sugarcane yield to decrease. Intercropping could improve the total profit of sugarcane, of which under the condition of 1.4 m row spacing then planting 2 rows of soybeans, the total profit increased the most noticeably. Furthermore, compared with conventional row spacing, the width spacing of sugarcane planting could improve the tillering rate, stalk diameter, plant height of sugarcane and the yield of soybean. Under suitable soybean interplanting row condition (2 rows), the sugarcane yield would not decrease; as a matter of fact, the total profit of the sugarcane fields could increase. Among the conditions, planting 2 rows of soybean with 1.4 m of row spacing increased the sugarcane fields profit the most. [Conclusion]Under the conditions of this study, the optimal sugarcane intercropping soybean model was planting 2 rows of soybeans at 1.4 m of sugarcane width spacing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean intercropping decreased sugarcane tillering rate and effective stalk number.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- intercropped with soybeane0
- Outcome
- tillering rate and effective stalk number of sugarcanee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“After the sugarcane intercropped with soybean, the tillering rate and effective stalk number of sugarcane decreased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not significantly affect sugarcane stalk diameter and height.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The effects of intercropping on the stalk diameter and plant height of sugarcane were insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
At 1.4 m spacing, intercropping was projected not to lower sugarcane yield.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- suitable sugarcane spacing (1.4 m)e0
- Outcome
- sugarcane yielde0
- Direction
- not cause the sugarcane yield to decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“under suitable sugarcane spacing (1.4 m), would not cause the sugarcane yield to decrease.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping improved total sugarcane profit.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping could improve the total profit of sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Two soybean rows at 1.4 m sugarcane spacing produced the greatest profit increase.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 1.4 m row spacing then planting 2 rows of soybeanse0
- Outcome
- total profite0
- Direction
- increased the most noticeablye0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“under the condition of 1.4 m row spacing then planting 2 rows of soybeans, the total profit increased the most noticeably.”
t0“sugarcane intercropped with soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Wider sugarcane spacing increased tillering, stalk diameter and height.
Verbatim
e0“compared with conventional row spacing, the width spacing of sugarcane planting could improve the tillering rate, stalk diameter, plant height of sugarcane and the yield of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wider sugarcane spacing increased soybean yield.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- width spacing of sugarcane plantinge0
- Outcome
- yield of soybeane0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Comparator
- conventional row spacinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with conventional row spacing, the width spacing of sugarcane planting could improve the tillering rate, stalk diameter, plant height of sugarcane and the yield of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Two soybean rows were projected not to reduce sugarcane yield.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- soybean interplanting row condition (2 rows)e0
- Outcome
- sugarcane yielde0
- Direction
- not decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Under suitable soybean interplanting row condition (2 rows), the sugarcane yield would not decrease”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors selected two soybean rows at 1.4 m sugarcane spacing as optimal.
Verbatim
e0“the optimal sugarcane intercropping soybean model was planting 2 rows of soybeans at 1.4 m of sugarcane width spacing.”
The same questions in other papers
Glycine max · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Glycine max · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →density · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →intercropping · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →density · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
206 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
301 papers more in this group
See all 305 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.