Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping improved total sugarcane profit.

A claim from Preliminary report on the optimal model for sugarcane intercropped with soybean · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved total sugarcane profit.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
total profit of sugarcanee0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping could improve the total profit of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–997

Title

Preliminary report on the optimal model for sugarcane intercropped with soybean

Wei GuiJian; Liang JingWen; Lu WenJuan; et al. Nanfang nongye xuebao 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-0146fe3c65d4e01ffa1b446c97af04843c6638d11cc9907a2de64f6bdd12b00e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    At harvest, stalk number for intercrops other than peanut equaled the control.

    EFFECT OF INTERCROPPING ON NEMATODES IN TWO SMALL-SCALE SUGARCANE FARMING SYSTEMS IN SOUTH AFRICA · 2009 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    All intercrops except maize reduced cane yield, through fewer millable canes.

    Production potential and profitability of autumn sugarcane-based intercropping systems as influenced by intercrops and row spacing · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Sugarcane with wheat yielded 105.5 t ha, the lowest cane yield.

    Prospects of intercropping rabi crops in autumn planted sugarcane. · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Intercropping significantly reduced yield in most cases where nitrogen response occurred.

    Intercropping in sugarcane: a practice worth pursuing? · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Green manure did not affect planted-cane millable yield.

    Integration of green manure intercropping and fertilizer-N for yield and juice quality and better soil conditions in sugarcane grown after mustard and wheat in different plant arrangements · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Okra intercropping reduced cane yield by 8.1% against sole sugarcane.

    Weed management in spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)-based intercropping systems · 2006 · compared with sole sugarcane

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Cane yield under maize intercropping was 70.8 t/ha, below cane alone.

    AGRONOMIC MANAGEMENT OF INTERCROPPING IN SUGARCANE AND ITS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS · 2010 · compared with cane alone

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Sugarcane production fell with 67% nitrogen and mung bean intercropping.

    Reducing nitrous oxide emissions from sugarcane soil with legume intercropping · 2016

    Opposite direction

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.