Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping significantly reduced yield in most cases where nitrogen response occurred.

A claim from Intercropping in sugarcane: a practice worth pursuing? · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly reduced yield in most cases where nitrogen response occurred.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
where a response to nitrogen was seene0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“in most cases where a response to nitrogen was seen, a significant reduction in yield was noted due to intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1234
t0

“Intercropping in sugarcane: a practice worth pursuing?”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54

Title

Intercropping in sugarcane: a practice worth pursuing?

P. V. Ramouthar; R. Rhodes; T. Wettergreen; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-c78ff341bd0bbd4aa58675edf52426077ef9ae2dc287025d66cf7eb38aebf19c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    At harvest, stalk number for intercrops other than peanut equaled the control.

    EFFECT OF INTERCROPPING ON NEMATODES IN TWO SMALL-SCALE SUGARCANE FARMING SYSTEMS IN SOUTH AFRICA · 2009 · compared with the control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Intercropping increased economic benefit by 87.84% compared with peanut monocropping.

    Sugarcane/peanut intercropping system improves the soil quality and increases the abundance of beneficial microbes · 2021 · compared with MP

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Intercrops gave higher land equivalent ratios than sole sugarcane in both years.

    Economic Assessment of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) through Intercropping · 2014 · compared with sole sugarcane

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Sugarcane trench planting with lentil intercropping outperformed other patterns for economic returns.

    Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Autumn Planted Sugarcane under Different Planting Patterns with Lentil Intercropping · 2020 · compared with other planting patterns

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Intercropping of rajmash produced high net profit.

    Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharurn complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane - ratoon system · 2001 · compared with sole sugarcane

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Ratoon sugarcane intercropped with lentil gave a higher cane yield (64.2 t/ha) than sole sugarcane.

    Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane - ratoon system · 2008 · compared with sugarcane sole

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Cowpea intercropping yielded 85.33 t/ha versus 82.17 t/ha control.

    Influence of intercrops on incidence of early shoot borer, Chilo infuscatellus Snellen in sugarcane. · 2010 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Relay intercropped autumn sugarcane had markedly more tillers (323 000 ha −1) than other cropping systems.

    INTRODUCING AUTUMN SUGARCANE AS A RELAY INTERCROP IN SKIPPED ROW PLANTED RICE–POTATO CROPPING SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY IN THE INDIAN SUB-TROPICS · 2010 · compared with other cropping systems

    Opposite direction

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.