Abstract
All the intercrops registered significantly less incidence of early shoot borer and intensity of internode borer than sole crop of sugarcane. Among intercrops, sugarcane intercropped with Greengram registered less incidence of earlyshoot borer (4.15%) followed by sugarcane intercropped with blackgram(4.25%) and cowpea (4.85%) whereas in sole crop showed higher incidence of 16.35% was recorded. Similarly sugarcane intercropped with cowpea showed less intensity of internode borer (2.11%) compared to the sole crop (8.22%) besides recording highest yield (85.33 t/ha) compared to control (82.17 t/ha). Sugarcane intercropped with greengram gave higher juice-sucrose (18.99%) compared to the sole crop (15.80%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
All intercrops reduced early shoot borer incidence and internode borer intensity versus sole sugarcane.
Verbatim
e0“All the intercrops registered significantly less incidence of early shoot borer and intensity of internode borer than sole crop of sugarcane”
t0“Chilo infuscatellus Snellen”
Claim · model-written summary
Greengram intercrop had 4.15% early shoot borer incidence.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane intercropped with Greengram registered less incidence of earlyshoot borer (4.15%)”
e1“sole crop showed higher incidence of 16.35%”
t0“Chilo infuscatellus Snellen”
Claim · model-written summary
Blackgram intercrop had 4.25% early shoot borer incidence.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane intercropped with blackgram(4.25%)”
e1“less incidence of earlyshoot borer (4.15%) followed by sugarcane intercropped with blackgram(4.25%)”
e2“sole crop showed higher incidence of 16.35%”
t0“Chilo infuscatellus Snellen”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercrop had 4.85% early shoot borer incidence.
Verbatim
e0“cowpea (4.85%)”
e1“less incidence of earlyshoot borer (4.15%) followed by sugarcane intercropped with blackgram(4.25%) and cowpea (4.85%)”
e2“sole crop showed higher incidence of 16.35%”
e3“sugarcane intercropped with Greengram”
t0“Chilo infuscatellus Snellen”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping reduced internode borer intensity to 2.11% versus 8.22%.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane intercropped with cowpea showed less intensity of internode borer (2.11%) compared to the sole crop (8.22%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping yielded 85.33 t/ha versus 82.17 t/ha control.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane intercropped with cowpea”
e1“highest yield (85.33 t/ha) compared to control (82.17 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Greengram intercropping increased sugarcane juice sucrose to 18.99% versus 15.80%.
Verbatim
e0“Sugarcane intercropped with greengram gave higher juice-sucrose (18.99%) compared to the sole crop (15.80%)”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna unguiculata · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Vigna unguiculata · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Vigna mungo · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →intercropping · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.