Claim · model-written summary
Cane yield under maize intercropping was 70.8 t/ha, below cane alone.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- intercropping of maizee1
- Outcome
- sugarcane yieldse0
- Direction
- Detrimentale1
- Value
- 70.8 t/hae0
- Comparator
- cane alonee0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the sugarcane yields were 111.1, 109.1, 106.9 and 70.8 t/ha, respectively for the 4 inter-crops and 107.4 t/ha for cane alone”
e1“Detrimental effect on NMC and cane yield was noticed due to intercropping of maize in sugarcane”
Title
AGRONOMIC MANAGEMENT OF INTERCROPPING IN SUGARCANE AND ITS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS
R. B. Khandagave 2010
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Planting systems did not significantly alter millable cane number or cane yield.
- Intervention effect Sunnhemp intercropping yielded 92 080 millable canes per hectare, above cane alone.
- Intervention effect Cowpea intercropping yielded 89 830 millable canes per hectare, above cane alone.
- Intervention effect Soybean intercropping yielded 87 830 millable canes per hectare, above cane alone.
- Intervention effect Maize intercropping reduced millable cane number to 68 880.
- Observation Cane yield under sunnhemp intercropping was 111.1 t/ha.
- Observation Cane yield under cowpea intercropping was 109.1 t/ha.
- Observation Cane yield under soybean intercropping was 106.9 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Dual-row planting improved benefit-cost ratio from 2.17 to 2:76 relative to single-row planting.
- Observation Soybean intercropping produced 1.5 t/ha grain yield.
- Observation Soybean intercropping yielded the highest net return at Rs68, 336/ha.
- Observation Soybean intercropping achieved a benefit-cost ratio of 3.21.
- Observation Maize intercropping produced lower net income and benefit-cost ratio despite higher maize yield.
- Observation Potato intercropping produced lower net income and benefit-cost ratio despite higher potato yield.
- Observation Intercropping improved soil chemical properties after cane harvest.