Paper · 2009 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Effect of Elymus repens on yield of winter wheat, spring barley and faba bean in an organic crop rotation experiment

Ilse A. Rasmussen; Mette Sønderskov; Christian Damgaard; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of crop rotation, nutrient levels and use of catch crops on effect of E. repens on a sandy soil at Jyndevad on yield of winter wheat (2006), spring barley (2007-2008) and faba bean (2006-2008) was studied in an existing organic crop rotation experiment (Olesen et al., 2000; Rasmussen et al., 2006). Some of the objectives were to determine the yield loss at different levels of infestation of the weed, and to determine whether this relationship was influenced by the treatments. For all crops, the treatments had a high impact on the yield. The two treatments that had no manure applied for up to 12 years consistently had the lowest yields. In spring barley, the two treatments with manure and with catch crops consistently had the highest yields. In faba bean, the treatment with manure and without catch crops had the highest yields. As for the effect of E. repens shoots on yield, in spring barley, there was a larger decrease in the system without grass clover. The same tendency was seen for winter wheat. For spring barley and faba bean, within each system (with or without grass clover), the yield in treatments without manure was less influenced by E. repens than in treatments with manure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments strongly affected yield across the crops.

Taxon
winter wheat, spring barley and faba beanVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all crops, the treatments had a high impact on the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat, spring barley and faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments without manure for up to 12 years had the lowest yields.

Taxon
winter wheat, spring barley and faba beanVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no manure applied for up to 12 yearse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two treatments that had no manure applied for up to 12 years consistently had the lowest yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat, spring barley and faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley yields were highest with manure and catch crops.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
manure and with catch cropse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spring barley, the two treatments with manure and with catch crops consistently had the highest yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean yield was highest with manure and without catch crops.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
manure and without catch cropse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In faba bean, the treatment with manure and without catch crops had the highest yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–849 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. repens shoots were associated with a larger spring barley yield decrease without grass clover.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Interactor
E. repensElymus repense0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
larger decreasee0
Setting
system without grass clovere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Elymus repens
Elymus repens · InteractorSpedona at French Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for the effect of E. repens shoots on yield, in spring barley, there was a larger decrease in the system without grass clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat showed the same tendency for the effect of E. repens on yield without grass clover.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
E. repensElymus repense1weed
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
larger decreasee1
Setting
system without grass clovere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Elymus repens
Elymus repens · InteractorSpedona at French Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same tendency was seen for winter wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“As for the effect of E. repens shoots on yield, in spring barley, there was a larger decrease in the system without grass clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without manure, spring barley yield was less influenced by E. repens than with manure.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
treatments without manuree0
Interactor
E. repensElymus repense0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
less influencede0
Comparator
treatments with manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Elymus repens
Elymus repens · InteractorSpedona at French Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For spring barley and faba bean, within each system (with or without grass clover), the yield in treatments without manure was less influenced by E. repens than in treatments with manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1212 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without manure, faba bean yield was less influenced by E. repens than with manure.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
treatments without manuree0
Interactor
E. repensElymus repense0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
less influencede0
Comparator
treatments with manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Elymus repens
Elymus repens · InteractorSpedona at French Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For spring barley and faba bean, within each system (with or without grass clover), the yield in treatments without manure was less influenced by E. repens than in treatments with manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1212 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

cover crop · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.