Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

Increasing Water Use and Water Use Efficiency in Dryland Wheat

J. F. Angus; A. F. van Herwaarden

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
292
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water use efficiency (WUE), the ratio of grain yield to crop water use, provides a simple means of assessing whether yield is limited by water supply or other factors. Based on this assessment, yields of commercial dryland wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) crops in southeastern Australia are usually not limited by water. Transpiration efficiency (TE), the ratio of yield to transpiration, is relatively stable for well‐managed crops, but the amount of water used is strongly affected by crop management. In a review of 13 comparisons of water use and wheat yield, providing optimum N fertilizer or suppressing cryptic root diseases with break crops increased water use by 23 mm and yields by 378 kg ha −1 , equivalent to 10% of the control yields. The additional soil water was extracted to levels of water potential as low as ‐5 MPa. A possible means of increasing yield potential of dryland crops is to manage transpiration so that relatively more water is used during the vegetative phase when vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is low, and hence TE is high. However, based on budgets of soil water and soluble carbohydrates stored in the vegetative organs and available for retranslocation, this option provides lower TE than conserving soil water for transpiration until grain filling when assimilates are directed to grain. Increasing the proportion of water transpired during the vegetative phase with N fertilizer can lead to particularly inefficient water use because increasing N status generally reduces the soluble carbohydrate reserves available for retranslocation to grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial dryland wheat yields in southeastern Australia are usually not limited by water.

Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
usually not limited by watere0
Setting
southeastern Australiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields of commercial dryland wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) crops in southeastern Australia are usually not limited by water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–317 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration efficiency was relatively stable for well-managed crops.

Outcome
Transpiration efficiency (TE)e0
Qualifier
well‐managed cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transpiration efficiency (TE), the ratio of yield to transpiration, is relatively stable for well‐managed crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crop management strongly affected the amount of water used.

Treatment
crop managemente0
Outcome
amount of water usede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of water used is strongly affected by crop management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen or break crops increased water use by 23 mm.

Treatment
optimum N fertilizere0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“providing optimum N fertilizer or suppressing cryptic root diseases with break crops increased water use by 23 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen or break crops increased wheat yield by 378 kg ha −1.

Treatment
optimum N fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
378 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“providing optimum N fertilizer or suppressing cryptic root diseases with break crops increased water use by 23 mm and yields by 378 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional soil water was extracted to water potentials as low as ‐5 MPa.

Outcome
soil water was extractede0
Value
‐5 MPae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The additional soil water was extracted to levels of water potential as low as ‐5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Using more water during the vegetative phase gave lower transpiration efficiency than conserving water until grain filling.

Outcome
TEe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conserving soil water for transpiration until grain fillinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this option provides lower TE than conserving soil water for transpiration until grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-driven vegetative transpiration can lead to inefficient water use.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
inefficient water usee0
Qualifier
reduces the soluble carbohydrate reserves available for retranslocation to graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the proportion of water transpired during the vegetative phase with N fertilizer can lead to particularly inefficient water use because increasing N status generally reduces the soluble carbohydrate reserves available for retranslocation to grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.