Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Saving Irrigation Water for Winter Wheat with Phosphorus Application in the North China Plain

Jianmin Li; A. Egrinya Eneji; Liusheng Duan; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conserving irrigation water resources is a most important measure for sustainable wheat production in the North China Plain. In the present study, the effect of phosphorus (P) application for saving irrigation water was evaluated. The application of fertilizer P increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, shoot biomass, head number, seed number and, consequently, grain yield, and increased soil water use and seasonal evapo-transpiration. The lower the volume of irrigation water applied, the more obvious were these effects. When winter wheat was basally fertilized with 88.5 kg P2O5/ha and irrigated with 90 mm at the jointing stage, the highest fertilizer P use efficiency, apparent P recovery and net profit (due to irrigation and/or fertilizer P) were obtained. The results suggested that fertilizer P should be used for saving irrigation water resources in the North China Plain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer P increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
fertilizer Pe0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of fertilizer P increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer P increased shoot biomass and head and seed number.

Treatment
fertilizer Pe0
Outcome
shoot biomass, head number, seed numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of fertilizer P increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, shoot biomass, head number, seed number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer P increased grain yield.

Treatment
fertilizer Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer P increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, shoot biomass, head number, seed number and, consequently, grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer P increased soil water use and seasonal evapotranspiration.

Treatment
fertilizer Pe0
Outcome
soil water use and seasonal evapo-transpiratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of fertilizer P increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, shoot biomass, head number, seed number and, consequently, grain yield, and increased soil water use and seasonal evapo-transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus effects became more pronounced as irrigation water volume decreased.

Treatment
irrigation watere0
Outcome
more obvious were these effectse0
Direction
more obviouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower the volume of irrigation water applied, the more obvious were these effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified phosphorus and irrigation regime produced the highest fertilizer P use efficiency and apparent P recovery.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
basally fertilized with 88.5 kg P2O5/ha and irrigated with 90 mm at the jointing stagee0
Outcome
fertilizer P use efficiency, apparent P recoverye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When winter wheat was basally fertilized with 88.5 kg P2O5/ha and irrigated with 90 mm at the jointing stage, the highest fertilizer P use efficiency, apparent P recovery and net profit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified phosphorus and irrigation regime produced the highest net profit.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
basally fertilized with 88.5 kg P2O5/ha and irrigated with 90 mm at the jointing stagee0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When winter wheat was basally fertilized with 88.5 kg P2O5/ha and irrigated with 90 mm at the jointing stage, the highest fertilizer P use efficiency, apparent P recovery and net profit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–721 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fertilizer P to save irrigation water in the North China Plain.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
fertilizer P should be used for saving irrigation water resourcese0
Setting
North China Plaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer P should be used for saving irrigation water resources in the North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 27 positive, 6 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.