Paper · 2010 · Soil in the Environment

Effect of phosphorus application and irrigation scheduling on wheat yield and phosphorus use efficiency.

Rahimin Affandi Abdul Rahim; A. M. Ranjha; Rahamtullah; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In view of the importance of wheat, less available and costly P fertilizer and shortage of water a field study was conducted under farmer’s field conditions to see the effect of phosphorus application and irrigation scheduling on wheat yield and phosphorus use efficiency. Fertilizer P doses 0, 47, 81 and 111 kg P2O5 ha -1 were calculated by using adsorption isotherms and applied by broadcast and band placement. Four irrigations i.e. 0, 2, 3, 4 were applied at critical stages of wheat. Basal N:K=130:65 kg ha -1 were applied. Wheat grain yield increased from 1.58 Mg ha -1 to 3.94 Mg ha -1 with the use of P @ 81 kg P2O5 ha -1 . Band placement of P proved better over broadcast, whilst three irrigations at crown roots, booting, and grain development stages were sufficient to get maximum yield and improve phosphorus use efficiency. Keyword: Wheat; Phosphorus use efficiency; Irrigation; Freundlich adsorption isotherms

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 81 kg P2O5 ha -1 increased wheat grain yield from 1.58 to 3.94 Mg ha -1.

Treatment
P @ 81 kg P2O5 ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.94 Mg ha -1e0
Qualifier
1.58 Mg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield increased from 1.58 Mg ha -1 to 3.94 Mg ha -1 with the use of P @ 81 kg P2O5 ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Band placement of phosphorus performed better than broadcast placement.

Treatment
Band placement of Pe0
Outcome
proved bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
broadcaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Band placement of P proved better over broadcast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations at crown roots, booting and grain development were sufficient for maximum wheat yield.

Treatment
three irrigations at crown roots, booting, and grain development stagese0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“three irrigations at crown roots, booting, and grain development stages were sufficient to get maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations at crown roots, booting and grain development improved wheat phosphorus use efficiency.

Treatment
three irrigations at crown roots, booting, and grain development stagese0
Outcome
phosphorus use efficiencye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“three irrigations at crown roots, booting, and grain development stages were sufficient to get maximum yield and improve phosphorus use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–836 · show in text ↑

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

crown compound · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.