Paper · 2018 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Site-specific Fertilizer Nitrogen Management in Irrigated Wheat using Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD meter) in the North-western India

Bijay Singh; Varinderpal Singh; Yadvinder Singh; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In irrigated wheat as grown in north-western India, fertilizer nitrogen (N) management following blanket recommendations is increasing resulting in stagnant yield levels with low N use efficiency. Site-specific nutrient management strategy to apply N as per need of wheat crop was formulated based on leaf colour measured by chlorophyll meter (Minolta SPAD meter) as a function of soil N supply. The SPAD meterguided protocols for fertilizer N application at crown root initiation (CRI) and maximum tillering (MT) stages, coinciding with first two irrigations, were evaluated through a series of field experiments with seven wheat varieties in Ludhiana and Gurdaspur in north-western India. Threshold leaf greenness levels equivalent to SPAD readings <40, <42.5 and <45 were tested in terms of (i) whether to apply fertilizer or not, and (ii) deciding as to how much fertilizer N needs to be applied as per requirement of the crop. At CRI stage, when the crop was about two-week old, fertilizer N dose could not be guided by SPAD meter because due to application of a basal dose of N at planting variation in the leaf colour was found to be very small. Also, due to small size of leaves at CRI stage it was difficult to use SPAD meter to measure leaf colour. Application of 30 kg N ha-1 at planting, 45 kg N ha-1 at CRI stage and a dose of 30 or 45 kg N ha-1 at MT stage depending upon leaf greenness to be = or < SPAD 42.5, respectively produced wheat grain yields at par with blanket recommendation for fertilizer N, but with higher fertilizer N use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At crown root initiation, basal nitrogen made leaf-colour variation too small for SPAD-guided dosing.

Organ / stage
CRIe1
Outcome
fertilizer N dose could not be guided by SPAD metere0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer N dose could not be guided by SPAD meter because due to application of a basal dose of N at planting variation in the leaf colour was found to be very small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“due to small size of leaves at CRI stage it was difficult to use SPAD meter to measure leaf colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small leaves at crown root initiation made SPAD leaf-colour measurement difficult.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
difficult to use SPAD meter to measure leaf coloure0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to small size of leaves at CRI stage it was difficult to use SPAD meter to measure leaf colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged N schedule produced wheat grain yields at par with the blanket recommendation.

Treatment
Application of 30 kg N ha-1 at planting, 45 kg N ha-1 at CRI stage and a dose of 30 or 45 kg N ha-1 at MT stagee0
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
blanket recommendation for fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 30 kg N ha-1 at planting, 45 kg N ha-1 at CRI stage and a dose of 30 or 45 kg N ha-1 at MT stage depending upon leaf greenness to be = or < SPAD 42.5, respectively produced wheat grain yields at par with blanket recommendation for fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged N schedule increased fertilizer N use efficiency relative to the blanket recommendation.

Treatment
Application of 30 kg N ha-1 at planting, 45 kg N ha-1 at CRI stage and a dose of 30 or 45 kg N ha-1 at MT stagee0
Outcome
fertilizer N use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
blanket recommendation for fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 30 kg N ha-1 at planting, 45 kg N ha-1 at CRI stage and a dose of 30 or 45 kg N ha-1 at MT stage depending upon leaf greenness to be = or < SPAD 42.5, respectively produced wheat grain yields at par with blanket recommendation for fertilizer N, but with higher fertilizer N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

crown compound · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 29 positive, 6 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.