Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At N rates below 150 kg N ha-1, no-tillage was not competitive with conventional tillage for grain yield and NUE.

A claim from Small-Scale Variation in Nitrogen Use Efficiency Parameters in Winter Wheat as Affected by N Fertilization and Tillage Intensity · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N rates below 150 kg N ha-1, no-tillage was not competitive with conventional tillage for grain yield and NUE.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
Gw and NUEe1
Direction
not competitivee1
Qualifier
At rates < 150 kg N ha−1e1
Comparator
CTe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we investigated how tillage (NT, no-tillage; CT, conventional tillage) and N fertilization affected the small-scale variation in NUE and winter wheat performance (grain yield, Gw; grain protein concentration, GPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–425
e1

“At rates < 150 kg N ha−1, NT was not competitive with CT in terms of Gw and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–813

Title

Small-Scale Variation in Nitrogen Use Efficiency Parameters in Winter Wheat as Affected by N Fertilization and Tillage Intensity

Ruth-Maria Hausherr Lüder; Ruijun Qin; Walter Richner; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12093621

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-233cbe4e3a698d3da0139020064090eae8bfce21fa0ae84a2802e561a4b39510 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 29 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.