Paper · 2021 · Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences

Phosphate solubilizing bacteria optimize wheat yield in mineral phosphorus applied alkaline soil

Fakhre Alam; Ayub Khan; Shah Fahad; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Limited availability of phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils is a major cause of poor growth and yield of crops throughout the world. Optimization of crops productivity can be achieved by increasing the bioavailability of P via phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB), however, their effectiveness may vary with changing agro-climatic conditions That’s why current experiment was conducted to evaluate the potential of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (with PSB and without PSB) in improving growth and yield of wheat under different P levels (0, 25, 50, and 100 % of recommended P). The PSB with 100% recommended P significantly enhanced wheat tillers m−2, grains spike-1, grains and biological yield compared to the rest of the treatment’s combination. A significant improvement in 100 grains weight and rate of photosynthesis also validated the efficacious functioning of PSB and full recommended P. Furthermore, PSB were effective in optimizing wheat yield attributes at respective P level compared to Without PSB. Our findings imply that, PSB application along with 100% recommended P as inorganic phosphorus has potential to enhance wheat growth and yield over sole application of P fertilizers or PSB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB plus full recommended phosphorus significantly increased wheat tillers, grains per spike, grain yield and biological yield relative to the other combinations.

Treatment
PSB with 100% recommended Pe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
wheat tillers m−2, grains spike-1, grains and biological yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the rest of the treatment’s combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PSB with 100% recommended P significantly enhanced wheat tillers m−2, grains spike-1, grains and biological yield compared to the rest of the treatment’s combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of wheat under different P levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB plus full recommended phosphorus significantly improved 100-grain weight and photosynthesis rate.

Treatment
PSB and full recommended Pe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
100 grains weight and rate of photosynthesise0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in 100 grains weight and rate of photosynthesis also validated the efficacious functioning of PSB and full recommended P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of wheat under different P levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB improved wheat yield attributes at corresponding phosphorus levels compared with no PSB.

Treatment
PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
wheat yield attributese0
Direction
optimizinge0
Comparator
Without PSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PSB were effective in optimizing wheat yield attributes at respective P level compared to Without PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1014 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of wheat under different P levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–539 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend PSB with full recommended phosphorus to enhance wheat growth and yield over either input alone.

Treatment
PSB application along with 100% recommended P as inorganic phosphoruse0
Outcome
wheat growth and yielde0
Comparator
sole application of P fertilizers or PSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PSB application along with 100% recommended P as inorganic phosphorus has potential to enhance wheat growth and yield over sole application of P fertilizers or PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1204 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.