Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

ACC Deaminase Producing PGPR Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Agrobacterium fabrum along with Biochar Improve Wheat Productivity under Drought Stress

Muhammad Zafar-ul-Hye; Subhan Danish; Mazhar Abbas; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
165
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress retards wheat plant’s vegetative growth and physiological processes and results in low productivity. A stressed plant synthesizes ethylene which inhibits root elongation; however, the enzyme 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate (ACC) deaminase catabolizes ethylene produced under water stress. Therefore, the ACC deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can be used to enhance crop productivity under drought stress. Biochar (BC) is an organically active and potentially nutrient-rich amendment that, when applied to the soil, can increase pore volume, cation exchange capacity and nutrient retention and bioavailability. We conducted a field experiment to study the effect of drought tolerant, ACC deaminase producing PGPR (with and without timber waste BC) on plant growth and yield parameters under drought stress. Two PGPR strains, Agrobacterium fabrum or Bacillus amyloliquefaciens were applied individually and in combination with 30 Mg ha−1 BC under three levels of irrigation, i.e., recommended four irrigations (4I), three irrigations (3I) and two irrigations (2I). Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I, significantly increased growth and yield traits of wheat: grain yield (36%), straw yield (50%), biological yield (40%). The same soil application under 2I resulted in greater increases in several of the growth and yield traits: grain yield (77%), straw yield (75%), above- and below-ground biomasses (77%), as compared to control; however, no significant increases in chlorophyll a, b or total, and photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in response to individual inoculation of a PGPR strain (without BC) were observed. Therefore, we suggest that the combined soil application of B. amyloliquefaciens and BC more effectively mitigates drought stress and improves wheat productivity as compared to any of the individual soil applications tested in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens with biochar under three irrigations increased wheat grain yield by 36% versus control.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3Ie0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I, significantly increased growth and yield traits of wheat: grain yield (36%), straw yield (50%), biological yield (40%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1512 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus amyloliquefaciens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment under 3I increased wheat straw yield by 50%.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3Ie0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I, significantly increased growth and yield traits of wheat: grain yield (36%), straw yield (50%), biological yield (40%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment under 3I increased wheat biological yield by 40%.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3Ie0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I, significantly increased growth and yield traits of wheat: grain yield (36%), straw yield (50%), biological yield (40%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment under 2I increased wheat grain yield by 77% versus control.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BCe1
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greater increasese0
Value
77%e0
Qualifier
under 2Ie0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same soil application under 2I resulted in greater increases in several of the growth and yield traits: grain yield (77%), straw yield (75%), above- and below-ground biomasses (77%), as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield traits of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment under 2I increased wheat straw yield by 75% versus control.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BCe1
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense1symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
greater increasese0
Value
75%e0
Qualifier
under 2Ie0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same soil application under 2I resulted in greater increases in several of the growth and yield traits: grain yield (77%), straw yield (75%), above- and below-ground biomasses (77%), as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield traits of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment under 2I increased above- and below-ground wheat biomasses by 77% versus control.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BCe1
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense1symbiont
Outcome
above- and below-ground biomassese0
Direction
greater increasese0
Value
77%e0
Qualifier
under 2Ie0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same soil application under 2I resulted in greater increases in several of the growth and yield traits: grain yield (77%), straw yield (75%), above- and below-ground biomasses (77%), as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of B. amyloliquefaciens and 30 Mg ha−1 BC under 3I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield traits of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual PGPR inoculation without biochar did not significantly increase wheat chlorophyll a, b or total.

Treatment
individual inoculation of a PGPR strain (without BC)e0
Interactor
PGPR straine0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b or totale0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant increases in chlorophyll a, b or total, and photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in response to individual inoculation of a PGPR strain (without BC) were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1709 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield traits of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual PGPR inoculation without biochar did not significantly increase wheat photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
individual inoculation of a PGPR strain (without BC)e0
Interactor
PGPR straine0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant increases in chlorophyll a, b or total, and photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in response to individual inoculation of a PGPR strain (without BC) were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1709 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield traits of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1239 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined B. amyloliquefaciens and biochar application to mitigate drought and improve wheat productivity relative to individual applications.

Treatment
combined soil application of B. amyloliquefaciens and BCe0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
mitigates drought stress and improves wheat productivitye0
Comparator
any of the individual soil applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we suggest that the combined soil application of B. amyloliquefaciens and BC more effectively mitigates drought stress and improves wheat productivity as compared to any of the individual soil applications tested in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1948 · show in text ↑

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 76 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.