Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ABAS increased spike length by 89-93% under 50% FC compared with NAS.

A claim from Organic amendments optimize Triticum aestivum var Zincol-16 performance under water stress through enhancement in physio biochemical traits, secondary metabolites and yield · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ABAS increased spike length by 89-93% under 50% FC compared with NAS.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum var Zincol-16Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
2.5% and 5% ABASe0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
89-93%e0
Qualifier
under 50% FCe0
Comparator
NASe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum var Zincol-16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59
e0

“plants grown in 2.5% and 5% ABAS had significantly (p < 0.05) higher leaf area (84-85%), spike length (89-93%), spikelet per spike (139-166%), and 1000 grain weight (133-157%) under 50% FC compared to NAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2281

Title

Organic amendments optimize Triticum aestivum var Zincol-16 performance under water stress through enhancement in physio biochemical traits, secondary metabolites and yield

Raquia Amir; Summera Jahan; Muddassar Zafar; et al. Scientific Reports 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99506-7

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-943a5f8dfbaf46af644d90ba7517a41fb918635e48a855c18550e3fe685ed090 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 19 in the model’s answer

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.