Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Meta-Analysis of the Response of the Productivity of Different Crops to Parameters and Processes in Soil Nitrogen Cycle under Biochar Addition

Leiyi Zhang; Zhuohao Wu; Jingyan Zhou; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar addition has been proposed to influence soil nitrogen (N) cycle and improve crop productivity. However, a comprehensive understanding of the impact of soil N cycle on the productivity of different crops under biochar addition remains elusive. Thus, a meta-analysis of 93 peer-reviewed field experiments was undertaken to investigate these outcomes of biochar addition. Results show that biochar addition significantly enhances crop productivity by 13.0%. The productivities of legumes, maize, and wheat were significantly increased by 21.2%, 14.3%, and 8.00% following biochar addition in the fields, respectively. However, the improvement in rice productivity is the lowest (3.36%), insignificant following biochar addition. The aggregated boosted tree, and partial least squares path analyses, indicated that the changes in the soil N pool (i.e., TN, NO3−-N, and NH4+-N) and plant N uptake were the most critical factors in increasing crop productivity under biochar addition. Although biochar addition had no significant enhancement on rice productivity, enhancing field rice nitrogen uptake and modest application of nitrogen fertilizers greatly improved rice productivity. The amount of soil NH4+-N was vital to improving legume productivity rather than biological N2 fixation when biochar was applied. Increases in NH4+-N content and decreasing NO3−-N content were favorable to improving maize productivity under biochar addition. In contrast, biochar additions did not significantly regulate the parameters and processes of soil N cycle to enhance wheat productivity. Overall, the productivity of different types of crops is greatly influenced by soil N cycle under biochar addition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition significantly enhanced crop productivity by 13.0%.

Taxon
cropst0
Treatment
biochar additione0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
enhancese0
Value
13.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results show that biochar addition significantly enhances crop productivity by 13.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition significantly increased legume productivity by 21.2% in the fields.

Taxon
legumese1
Treatment
biochar additione1
Outcome
productivitiese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.2%e1
Setting
in the fieldse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The productivities of legumes, maize, and wheat were significantly increased by 21.2%, 14.3%, and 8.00% following biochar addition in the fields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition significantly increased maize productivity by 14.3% in the fields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
biochar additione1
Outcome
productivitiese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.3%e1
Setting
in the fieldse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The productivities of legumes, maize, and wheat were significantly increased by 21.2%, 14.3%, and 8.00% following biochar addition in the fields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition significantly increased wheat productivity by 8.00% in the fields.

Treatment
biochar additione1
Outcome
productivitiese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.00%e1
Setting
in the fieldse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The productivities of legumes, maize, and wheat were significantly increased by 21.2%, 14.3%, and 8.00% following biochar addition in the fields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition gave a rice productivity increase of 3.36% that was lowest and not significant.

Treatment
biochar additione2
Outcome
rice productivitye2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
3.36%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, the improvement in rice productivity is the lowest (3.36%), insignificant following biochar addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–732 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhancing field rice nitrogen uptake and modest nitrogen fertilizer application greatly improved rice productivity.

Treatment
enhancing field rice nitrogen uptakee3
Outcome
rice productivitye3
Direction
improvede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although biochar addition had no significant enhancement on rice productivity, enhancing field rice nitrogen uptake and modest application of nitrogen fertilizers greatly improved rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1184 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in the soil N pool and plant N uptake were the most critical factors in increasing crop productivity under biochar addition.

Taxon
cropst0
Treatment
changes in the soil N poole4
Outcome
crop productivitye4
Direction
increasinge4

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“the changes in the soil N pool (i.e., TN, NO3−-N, and NH4+-N) and plant N uptake were the most critical factors in increasing crop productivity under biochar addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NH4+-N was vital to improving legume productivity rather than biological N2 fixation when biochar was applied.

Taxon
legumee5
Compound
NH4+-Ne5
Outcome
legume productivitye5
Direction
improvinge5
Qualifier
rather than biological N2 fixatione5

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“The amount of soil NH4+-N was vital to improving legume productivity rather than biological N2 fixation when biochar was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1314 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increases in NH4+-N content were favorable to improving maize productivity under biochar addition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
biochar additione6
Compound
NH4+-N contente6
Outcome
maize productivitye6
Direction
improvinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increases in NH4+-N content and decreasing NO3−-N content were favorable to improving maize productivity under biochar addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1443 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing NO3−-N content was favorable to improving maize productivity under biochar addition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
biochar additione6
Compound
NO3−-N contente6
Outcome
maize productivitye6
Direction
decreasinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increases in NH4+-N content and decreasing NO3−-N content were favorable to improving maize productivity under biochar addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar additions did not significantly regulate the soil N cycle to enhance wheat productivity.

Treatment
biochar additionse7
Outcome
wheat productivitye7
Direction
increaseinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e7

“biochar additions did not significantly regulate the parameters and processes of soil N cycle to enhance wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1581 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Productivity of different types of crops is greatly influenced by the soil N cycle under biochar addition.

Taxon
cropse0
Treatment
biochar additione0
Outcome
productivity of different types of cropse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity of Different Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“the productivity of different types of crops is greatly influenced by soil N cycle under biochar addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1697 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 111 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 135 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.