Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Antioxidant proteins were upregulated or induced five days after F. graminearum inoculation.

A claim from Identification of proteins induced or upregulated by Fusarium head blight infection in the spikes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant proteins were upregulated or induced five days after F. graminearum inoculation.

Treatment
inoculation with F. graminearume0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Gene
superoxide dismutase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs)e0
Outcome
Proteins with an antioxidant functione0
Direction
upregulated or inducede0
Qualifier
5 d after inoculatione0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proteins with an antioxidant function such as superoxide dismutase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) were upregulated or induced 5 d after inoculation with F. graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1106
t0

“hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–136

Title

Identification of proteins induced or upregulated by Fusarium head blight infection in the spikes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Wenchun Zhou; Frederic L Kolb; Dean E Riechers Genome 2005. doi:10.1139/g05-041

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-7067b00cb0b28f732f9b4ceec94506b6905ea917da60eab391d962185fca004c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.