Abstract
Inoculation with a culture of Puccinia recondita resulted in a susceptible infection type (IT) on Thatcher, a moderately resistant IT on Lrl6, and a highly resistant IT on Lr\9.The apparent photosynthetic rate (APR) and stomatal conductance were determined on days 0,4, 6, 8, 12, 15, and 20 after inoculation.Significant reductions in APR were detected 8 days after inoculation of Thatcher and the line containing Lrl6.Differences between healthy and P. recondita inoculated plants increased on each date of measurement until day 20 after inoculation when the APR of infected plants of Thatcher and those containing Lr 16 was reduced to about 56% of healthy.There were no significant differences between healthy plants and plants carrying Lr 19 following inoculation with P. recondita for any sampling date.This demonstrated t he value of resistance to P. recondita.The numbers of uredia cm" 2 were significantly negatively correlated with APR on day 20 after inoculation for Thatcher and the Lr 16 line.At day 20 the average stomatal conductance for both Thatcher and the Lrl6 line was significantly less than that of the healthy controls.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated Thatcher wheat showed a susceptible infection type to Puccinia recondita.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Thatchere0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with a culture of Puccinia reconditae0
- Interactor
- Puccinia recondita
Puccinia reconditae0pathogen - Outcome
- susceptible infection typee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpeg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e0“Inoculation with a culture of Puccinia recondita resulted in a susceptible infection type (IT) on Thatcher, a moderately resistant IT on Lrl6”
Claim · model-written summary
The Lrl6 wheat line showed a moderately resistant infection type to Puccinia recondita.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Lrl6e0
- Interactor
- Puccinia recondita
Puccinia reconditae0pathogen - Outcome
- moderately resistant ITe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpeg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e0“Inoculation with a culture of Puccinia recondita resulted in a susceptible infection type (IT) on Thatcher, a moderately resistant IT on Lrl6”
Claim · model-written summary
The Lr9 wheat line showed a highly resistant infection type to Puccinia recondita.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Lr\9e1
- Interactor
- Puccinia recondita
Puccinia reconditae0pathogen - Outcome
- highly resistant ITe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpeg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e0“Inoculation with a culture of Puccinia recondita resulted in a susceptible infection type (IT) on Thatcher, a moderately resistant IT on Lrl6”
e1“a highly resistant IT on Lr\9”
Claim · model-written summary
Infection significantly reduced apparent photosynthetic rate 8 days after inoculation in Thatcher and the Lrl6 line.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Thatcher and the line containing Lrl6e1
- Treatment
- inoculatione1
- Interactor
- P. recondita
Puccinia reconditae2pathogen - Outcome
- APRe1
- Direction
- reductionse1
- Qualifier
- 8 days after inoculatione1
- Comparator
- healthye2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpeg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e1“Significant reductions in APR were detected 8 days after inoculation of Thatcher and the line containing Lrl6”
e2“Differences between healthy and P. recondita inoculated plants increased on each date of measurement until day 20 after inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
At day 20 the apparent photosynthetic rate of infected Thatcher and Lr16-carrying plants was reduced to about 56% of healthy plants.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Thatcher and those containing Lr 16e3
- Treatment
- inoculatione3
- Outcome
- APRe3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- about 56%e3
- Qualifier
- day 20 after inoculatione3
- Comparator
- healthye3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e3“until day 20 after inoculation when the APR of infected plants of Thatcher and those containing Lr 16 was reduced to about 56% of healthy”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences in apparent photosynthetic rate between healthy and P. recondita inoculated plants increased over time until day 20.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Interactor
- P. recondita
Puccinia reconditae2pathogen - Outcome
- Differencese2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- healthye2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpeg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e2“Differences between healthy and P. recondita inoculated plants increased on each date of measurement until day 20 after inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants carrying Lr19 showed no significant difference in apparent photosynthetic rate from healthy plants after inoculation with P. recondita.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- plants carrying Lr 19e5
- Treatment
- inoculation with P. reconditae5
- Outcome
- APRe6
- Direction
- no significant differencese5
- Comparator
- healthy plantse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e5“There were no significant differences between healthy plants and plants carrying Lr 19 following inoculation with P. recondita for any sampling date”
e6“The apparent photosynthetic rate (APR) and stomatal conductance were determined on days 0,4, 6, 8, 12, 15, and 20 after inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Uredia counts were significantly negatively correlated with apparent photosynthetic rate on day 20 in Thatcher and the Lr16 line.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Thatcher and the Lr 16 linee7
- Outcome
- APRe7
- Direction
- negatively correlatede7
- Qualifier
- day 20 after inoculatione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e7“significantly negatively correlated with APR on day 20 after inoculation for Thatcher and the Lr 16 line”
Claim · model-written summary
On day 20 stomatal conductance in Thatcher and the Lrl6 line was significantly lower than in healthy controls.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Thatcher and the Lrl6 linee1
- Outcome
- stomatal conductancee1
- Direction
- significantly lesse1
- Comparator
- healthy controlse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“infected wheat plants”
e1“At day 20 the average stomatal conductance for both Thatcher and the Lrl6 line was significantly less than that of the healthy controls”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Puccinia recondita · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.