Paper · 2021 · Applied Sciences

Mitigation of NaCl Stress in Wheat by Rhizosphere Engineering Using Salt Habitat Adapted PGPR Halotolerant Bacteria

Souhila Kerbab; Allaoua Silini; Ali Chenari Bouket; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
103
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is a great interest in mitigating soil salinity that limits plant growth and productivity. In this study, eighty-nine strains were isolated from the rhizosphere and endosphere of two halophyte species (Suaeda mollis and Salsola tetrandra) collected from three chotts in Algeria. They were screened for diverse plant growth-promoting traits, antifungal activity and tolerance to different physico-chemical conditions (pH, PEG, and NaCl) to evaluate their efficiency in mitigating salt stress and enhancing the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana and durum wheat under NaCl–stress conditions. Three bacterial strains BR5, OR15, and RB13 were finally selected and identified as Bacillus atropheus. The Bacterial strains (separately and combined) were then used for inoculating Arabidopsis thaliana and durum wheat during the seed germination stage under NaCl stress conditions. Results indicated that inoculation of both plant spp. with the bacterial strains separately or combined considerably improved the growth parameters. Three soils with different salinity levels (S1 = 0.48, S2 = 3.81, and S3 = 2.80 mS/cm) were used to investigate the effects of selected strains (BR5, OR15, and RB13; separately and combined) on several growth parameters of wheat plants. The inoculation (notably the multi-strain consortium) proved a better approach to increase the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents as compared to control plants. However, proline content, lipid peroxidation, and activities of antioxidant enzymes decreased after inoculation with the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that can attenuate the adverse effects of salt stress by reducing the reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. These results indicated that under saline soil conditions, halotolerant PGPR strains are promising candidates as biofertilizers under salt stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus atropheus strains improved Arabidopsis growth under NaCl stress.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Treatment
inoculation of both plant spp. with the bacterial strains separately or combinede0
Interactor
bacterial strainse0symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of both plant spp. with the bacterial strains separately or combined considerably improved the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana and durum wheat under NaCl–stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus atropheus strains improved durum wheat growth under NaCl stress.

Treatment
inoculation of both plant spp. with the bacterial strains separately or combinede0
Interactor
bacterial strainse0symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of both plant spp. with the bacterial strains separately or combined considerably improved the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana and durum wheat under NaCl–stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased wheat chlorophyll and carotenoid contents relative to controls.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
multi-strain consortiume0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation (notably the multi-strain consortium) proved a better approach to increase the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents as compared to control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation decreased wheat proline, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
inoculation with the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e0
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e0symbiont
Outcome
proline content, lipid peroxidation, and activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content, lipid peroxidation, and activities of antioxidant enzymes decreased after inoculation with the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · growth · Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 76 positive, 6 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.