Paper · 2010 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat as Affected by Preceding Crop, Application Rate of Nitrogen and Crop Residues

Majid Rahimizadeh; Ali Kashani; Ahmad Zare-Feizabadi; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
90
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out under temperate climate condition of Khorasan province, Iran, during 2006-2008 growing seasons to determine the suitable crop rotation for enhancing nitrogen use efficiency of wheat. A three-factor experiment was laid out as splitsplit plot arrangement (RCBD) with three replications. Main plots were five preceding crops for wheat practices viz. wheat, potato, silage corn, clover and sugar beet. Sub plots were N fertilizer rates in preceding crop including no N (control), 50% lower than recommended N rate, recommended N rate and 50% more than recommended rate. The sub-sub plots were preceding crop residue return including no residue return (control) and 50% return. Results showed that nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE), nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUtE), nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and grain protein content (GPC) in wheat were significantly affected by preceding crop. Fertilizer N rate applied on preceding crops, significantly influenced NUE, NUpE and grain protein content of wheat. NUE, NUpE, NUtE and NHI of wheat grown after potato recorded the highest values. While, the lowest NUE indices and grain protein content of wheat were found for wheat-wheat rotation. The higher NUE of wheat in the potatowheat rotation was due to the higher NUpE in this rotation. NUE and NUpE in all crop rotations reduced with increasing N fertilizer rate. Return of crop residue had no significant effect on NUE indices expect NHI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding crop significantly affected five wheat nitrogen and protein indices.

Treatment
preceding crope0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE), nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUtE)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE), nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUtE), nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and grain protein content (GPC) in wheat were significantly affected by preceding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N rate significantly influenced wheat NUE, NUpE and grain protein.

Treatment
Fertilizer N rate applied on preceding cropse0
Outcome
NUE, NUpE and grain protein contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N rate applied on preceding crops, significantly influenced NUE, NUpE and grain protein content of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat after potato had highest NUE, NUpE and NUtE.

Treatment
after potatoe0
Outcome
NUE, NUpE, NUtEe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE, NUpE, NUtE and NHI of wheat grown after potato recorded the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat after potato had highest NHI.

Treatment
after potatoe0
Outcome
NHIe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE, NUpE, NUtE and NHI of wheat grown after potato recorded the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-wheat rotation had lowest NUE indices and grain protein content.

Treatment
wheat-wheat rotatione0
Outcome
NUE indices and grain protein contente0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest NUE indices and grain protein content of wheat were found for wheat-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1241 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher NUpE accounted for higher NUE in potato-wheat rotation.

Outcome
higher NUEe0
Qualifier
higher NUpEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher NUE of wheat in the potatowheat rotation was due to the higher NUpE in this rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer N rate reduced NUE and NUpE across rotations.

Treatment
increasing N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
NUE and NUpEe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NUE and NUpE in all crop rotations reduced with increasing N fertilizer rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue return had no significant effect on NUE indices other than NHI.

Treatment
Return of crop residuee0
Outcome
NUE indicese0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Qualifier
expect NHIe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Return of crop residue had no significant effect on NUE indices expect NHI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

rotation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

organic · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.