Paper · 1994 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Ertragsbildung von getreidereichen Fruchtfolgen und Getreide‐monokulturen in einem extensiven und intensiven Anbausystem

A. Panse; F. X. Maidl; J. Dennert; et al.

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Yield formation in cereal‐rich crop rotations and monocultures in an extensive and intensive crop‐management system In a long duration trial, conducted from 1979/80 to 1992 at TU‐Munich's research station in Roggenstein, the performance of monocultures of winter wheat, winter barley and winter rye, as well as numerous cereal‐crop rotations were compared in an extensive and intensive crop‐management system. The results obtained can be summarized as follows. Over the course of 13 years, the influence of the immediately preceding crop on the yield of the main crops was of much greater significance than the rotation as a whole. With winter wheat, no yield differences could be observed between monoculture and cereal crop rotation (if the rotation did not include oats). Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat. Winter barley yields were not significantly different in monoculture, cereal crop rotations and crop rotations containing 66% cereals. Furthermore, winter rye yields were the same in monocultures and cereal crop rotations. With all cereals, intensification of fertilizing and chemical plant protection led to a considerable increase in yield, but did not diminish the effects of the preceding crop. Hence, even with the use of modern agronomical techniques it is impossible to compensate for yield losses due to crop rotation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preceding crop had a greater influence on main-crop yield than the entire rotation over 13 years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
immediately preceding crope0
Outcome
yield of the main cropse0
Direction
much greater significancee0
Comparator
rotation as a wholee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over the course of 13 years, the influence of the immediately preceding crop on the yield of the main crops was of much greater significance than the rotation as a whole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat, winter barley and winter rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield did not differ between monoculture and cereal rotation without oats.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
no yield differencese0
Qualifier
if the rotation did not include oatse0
Comparator
cereal crop rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With winter wheat, no yield differences could be observed between monoculture and cereal crop rotation (if the rotation did not include oats)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats as a preceding crop raised following wheat yield by 13 dt/ha on average.

Treatment
Oatse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13 dt/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rape as a preceding crop raised following wheat yield by 13 dt/ha on average.

Treatment
rapee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13 dt/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field bean as a preceding crop raised following wheat yield by 13 dt/ha on average.

Treatment
field beane0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13 dt/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea as a preceding crop raised following wheat yield by 13 dt/ha on average.

Treatment
peae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13 dt/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato as a preceding crop raised following wheat yield by 13 dt/ha on average.

Treatment
potatoe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13 dt/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize as a preceding crop raised following wheat yield by 13 dt/ha on average.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13 dt/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oats, rape, field bean, pea, potato and maize as preceding crops, however, in crop management systems, led to, on average, an increase in yield of 13 dt/ha from the following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter barley yield did not significantly differ across monoculture, cereal rotation and rotation with 66% cereals.

Taxon
Winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
cereal crop rotations and crop rotations containing 66% cerealse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter barley yields were not significantly different in monoculture, cereal crop rotations and crop rotations containing 66% cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter rye yields were the same in monoculture and cereal rotations.

Taxon
winter ryeSecale cerealee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
the samee0
Comparator
cereal crop rotationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter rye yields were the same in monocultures and cereal crop rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensified fertilization and chemical protection considerably increased yield of all cereals.

Taxon
cerealse0
Treatment
intensification of fertilizing and chemical plant protectione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With all cereals, intensification of fertilizing and chemical plant protection led to a considerable increase in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensification did not diminish preceding-crop effects.

Taxon
cerealst0
Outcome
effects of the preceding crope0
Direction
did not diminishe0

Verbatim

e0

“but did not diminish the effects of the preceding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“With all cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1205 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude modern agronomic techniques cannot compensate for rotation-related yield losses.

Taxon
cerealst0
Outcome
impossible to compensate for yield losses due to crop rotatione0

Verbatim

e0

“even with the use of modern agronomical techniques it is impossible to compensate for yield losses due to crop rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“With all cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1205 · show in text ↑

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Avena sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Brassica napus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.