Paper · 1992 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Nitrogen nutrition of wheat following different crops

H. E. Echeverría; C. A. Navarro; F. H. Andrade

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A trial using a split-plot with blocks design was carried out at the INTA Balcarce Experimental Station, Argentina on a typic argiudol soil to evaluate N nutrition in wheat after different preceding crops and using two rates of N fertilization (0 and 90 kg N/ha). Wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), soyabean ( Glycine max ), sunflower ( Helianthus annuus ) and maize ( Zea mays ) were grown in different combinations for two successive years (1984/85 and 1985/86). No water stress was detected during either growing season. Nitrogen availability was altered by the previous crops grown, but the effect lasted only for one season. Wheat following maize yielded least with no N and responded most to N fertilization. The highest yields of wheat without N and the lowest response by wheat to N fertilization were found after crops of soyabean and sunflower. Wheat after a fertilized wheat crop did not respond to N fertilization because of a serious attack of take-all ( Gaeumannomyces graminis tritici ). The nitrate concentration in wheat stem bases was found to be a good estimator of the availability of soil N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding crops changed nitrogen availability for one season.

Treatment
previous cropse0
Outcome
Nitrogen availabilitye0
Direction
alterede0
Qualifier
only for one seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen availability was altered by the previous crops grown, but the effect lasted only for one season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat after maize had the lowest yield without nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
following maizee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
leaste0
Qualifier
with no Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat following maize yielded least with no N and responded most to N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat after maize responded most to nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
respondede0
Direction
moste0
Qualifier
following maizee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat following maize yielded least with no N and responded most to N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following soyabean had among the highest yields without nitrogen.

Treatment
soyabeane0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
without Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields of wheat without N and the lowest response by wheat to N fertilization were found after crops of soyabean and sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following sunflower had among the highest yields without nitrogen.

Treatment
sunflowere0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
without Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields of wheat without N and the lowest response by wheat to N fertilization were found after crops of soyabean and sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following soyabean had a low response to nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
response by wheate0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
after crops of soyabeane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields of wheat without N and the lowest response by wheat to N fertilization were found after crops of soyabean and sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following sunflower had a low response to nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
response by wheate0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
after crops of soyabean and sunflowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields of wheat without N and the lowest response by wheat to N fertilization were found after crops of soyabean and sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat after fertilized wheat did not respond to nitrogen fertilization during severe take-all.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminis triticiGaeumannomyces graminise0pathogen
Outcome
responde0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat after a fertilized wheat crop did not respond to N fertilization because of a serious attack of take-all ( Gaeumannomyces graminis tritici ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1004 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate concentration in wheat stem bases estimated soil nitrogen availability well.

Organ / stage
stem basese0
Outcome
good estimator of the availability of soil Ne0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrate concentration in wheat stem bases was found to be a good estimator of the availability of soil N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1114 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · Gaeumannomyces graminis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.