Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Modeling of Phosphorus Nutrition to Obtain Maximum Yield, High P Use Efficiency and Low P-Loss Risk for Wheat Grown in Sandy Calcareous Soils

Zhanyao Hu; Zheli Ding; Hatim M. Al-Yasi; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fertilization with high levels of phosphorus increases the risk of environmental pollution. Identification of critical values of P in soil (SOP) and in plant tissues (PiP) is essential for achieving the maximum wheat yield without P loss. The critical value is the value of P which gives the optimum yield; the response of crop yield to P fertilization above this value is not predictable or nil. Here, a 4-year field experiment was conducted to identify the SOP and PiP for achieving maximum yield of bread wheat using 11 rates of P fertilization (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, and 150 kg P2O5 ha−1). The linear–linear and Mitscherlich exponential models were employed to estimate the PiP and SOP. The degree of phosphorus saturation (DPS) was used to assess the potential environmental risk; furthermore, phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) was also calculated under the studied fertilization levels. Phosphorus in soil and wheat plant was affected by the application rates and growing seasons. Increasing P fertilization rates led to gradual increases in soil and plant P. The SOP ranged between 21 and 32 mg kg−1, while the PiP ranged between 6.40 and 7.49 g kg−1. The critical values of P calculated from the Mitscherlich exponential models were 20% higher than those calculated from the linear–linear models. Adding levels of P fertilization ≥90 kg P2O5 ha−1 leads to higher potentials of P runoff and leaching, in addition, PUE decreased sharply under high P fertilization levels. The response of wheat yield to P fertilization in sandy calcareous soil is predictable below Olsen P values of 21 mg kg−1. Identification of critical P values for wheat production is of great importance to help policy makers improve P use efficiency and attain optimum wheat yield under eco-friendly environmental conditions by eliminating the accumulation of excess P fertilizers in soil and water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P fertilization gradually increased soil P.

Treatment
Increasing P fertilization ratese0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing P fertilization rates led to gradual increases in soil and plant P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P fertilization gradually increased plant P.

Treatment
Increasing P fertilization ratese0
Outcome
plant Pe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing P fertilization rates led to gradual increases in soil and plant P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical soil P ranged from 21 to 32 mg kg−1.

Outcome
SOPe0
Value
21 and 32 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SOP ranged between 21 and 32 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical plant P ranged from 6.40 to 7.49 g kg−1.

Outcome
PiPe0
Value
6.40 and 7.49 g kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the PiP ranged between 6.40 and 7.49 g kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Mitscherlich models gave critical P values 20% higher than linear–linear models.

Outcome
critical values of Pe0
Direction
highere0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
linear–linear modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical values of P calculated from the Mitscherlich exponential models were 20% higher than those calculated from the linear–linear models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization at or above 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 increased potential runoff and leaching.

Treatment
P fertilization ≥90 kg P2O5 ha−1e0
Outcome
P runoff and leachinge0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding levels of P fertilization ≥90 kg P2O5 ha−1 leads to higher potentials of P runoff and leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1424 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High P fertilization sharply decreased P use efficiency.

Treatment
high P fertilization levelse0
Outcome
PUEe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PUE decreased sharply under high P fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–222 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield response to P fertilization was predictable below Olsen P of 21 mg kg−1.

Outcome
response of wheat yield to P fertilizatione0
Value
21 mg kg−1e0
Qualifier
sandy calcareous soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of wheat yield to P fertilization in sandy calcareous soil is predictable below Olsen P values of 21 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1617 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

phosphorus · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 27 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.