Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Foliar Applied Phosphorous Enhanced Growth, Chlorophyll Contents, Gas Exchange Attributes and PUE in Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)

Ejaz Ahmad Waraich; Zahoor Ahmad; Rashid Ahmad; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the foliar applied phosphorous with and without pre-plant dose (50 kg hac.−1) of phosphorous on growth, chlorophyll contents, gas exchange parameters and phosphorous use efficiency (PUE) of wheat. The experiment was conducted in net house at Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan. Two promising wheat cultivar AARI 2011 and FSD 2008 were used as a test crop with 5 foliar phosphorus (P) rates (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 kg ha−1). The foliar applied P with pre-plant performed better than without pre-plant and control treatments. Foliar treatment of phosphorus at 6 kg ha−1 P proved to be the best among other foliar treatments followed by 8 kg ha−1 P. The foliar application of phosphorous at 6 kg hac.−1 with pre-plant soil applied P increased the shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight and root dry weight. The chlorophyll contents (Chl. a and b) were increased with the foliar application of phosphorous. The gas exchange parameters (net carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilation rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and sub-stomatal CO2 rate) were significantly improved by foliar applied P. The maximum values of net CO2 assimilation rate (5.27 μ mol m−2 sec.−1), transpiration rate (3.44 μ mol m−2 sec.−1), stomatal conductance (0.81 μ mol m−2 sec.−1) and sub-stomatal CO2 (271.67 μ mol m−2 sec.−1), were recorded in the treatment where P was foliar applied at 6 kg hac.−1 with pre-plant soil applied Phosphorous. The foliar application of phosphorous with pre-plant soil applied P enhanced Phosphorous use efficiency (PUE) in both varieties. The maximum value of PUE (15.42%) was recorded in the treatment where foliar feeding of P was done at 6 kg hac.−1 with pre-plant soil applied P in both genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus with pre-plant phosphorus performed better than foliar phosphorus without it and controls.

Treatment
foliar applied P with pre-plante0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
performed bettere0
Comparator
without pre-plant and control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar applied P with pre-plant performed better than without pre-plant and control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus at 6 kg ha−1 performed best among foliar treatments.

Treatment
Foliar treatment of phosphorus at 6 kg ha−1 Pe0
Outcome
the beste0
Direction
the beste0
Comparator
other foliar treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar treatment of phosphorus at 6 kg ha−1 P proved to be the best among other foliar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus at 6 kg hac.−1 with pre-plant phosphorus increased shoot and root lengths and fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
foliar application of phosphorous at 6 kg hac.−1 with pre-plant soil applied Pe0
Outcome
shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of phosphorous at 6 kg hac.−1 with pre-plant soil applied P increased the shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight and root dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus increased chlorophyll a and b content in wheat.

Treatment
foliar application of phosphorouse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contents (Chl. a and b)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll contents (Chl. a and b) were increased with the foliar application of phosphorous.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus significantly improved gas exchange parameters in wheat.

Treatment
foliar applied Pe0
Outcome
net carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilation rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gas exchange parameters (net carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilation rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and sub-stomatal CO2 rate) were significantly improved by foliar applied P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus with pre-plant phosphorus enhanced phosphorus use efficiency in both wheat varieties.

Treatment
foliar application of phosphorous with pre-plant soil applied Pe0
Outcome
Phosphorous use efficiency (PUE)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of phosphorous with pre-plant soil applied P enhanced Phosphorous use efficiency (PUE) in both varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–128 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 27 positive, 6 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 70 positive, 2 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.