Paper · 2009 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems

Xiao-Tang Ju; Guang-Xi Xing; Xin-Ping Chen; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2,567
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Excessive N fertilization in intensive agricultural areas of China has resulted in serious environmental problems because of atmospheric, soil, and water enrichment with reactive N of agricultural origin. This study examines grain yields and N loss pathways using a synthetic approach in 2 of the most intensive double-cropping systems in China: waterlogged rice/upland wheat in the Taihu region of east China versus irrigated wheat/rainfed maize on the North China Plain. When compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization with 30-60% N savings, we found that current agricultural N practices with 550-600 kg of N per hectare fertilizer annually do not significantly increase crop yields but do lead to about 2 times larger N losses to the environment. The higher N loss rates and lower N retention rates indicate little utilization of residual N by the succeeding crop in rice/wheat systems in comparison with wheat/maize systems. Periodic waterlogging of upland systems caused large N losses by denitrification in the Taihu region. Calcareous soils and concentrated summer rainfall resulted in ammonia volatilization (19% for wheat and 24% for maize) and nitrate leaching being the main N loss pathways in wheat/maize systems. More than 2-fold increases in atmospheric deposition and irrigation water N reflect heavy air and water pollution and these have become important N sources to agricultural ecosystems. A better N balance can be achieved without sacrificing crop yields but significantly reducing environmental risk by adopting optimum N fertilization techniques, controlling the primary N loss pathways, and improving the performance of the agricultural Extension Service.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

Taxon
rice/upland wheate1
Treatment
current agricultural N practices with 550-600 kg of N per hectare fertilizer annuallye0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
do not significantly increasee0
Value
30-60%e0
Comparator
knowledge-based optimum N fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“When compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization with 30-60% N savings, we found that current agricultural N practices with 550-600 kg of N per hectare fertilizer annually do not significantly increase crop yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“waterlogged rice/upland wheat in the Taihu region of east China versus irrigated wheat/rainfed maize on the North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Current high nitrogen practices cause about twice the environmental nitrogen losses of optimum fertilization.

Taxon
rice/upland wheate1
Treatment
current agricultural N practices with 550-600 kg of N per hectare fertilizer annuallye0
Outcome
N losses to the environmente0
Direction
largere0
Value
about 2 timese0
Comparator
knowledge-based optimum N fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“When compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization with 30-60% N savings, we found that current agricultural N practices with 550-600 kg of N per hectare fertilizer annually do not significantly increase crop yields but do lead to about 2 times larger N losses to the environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“waterlogged rice/upland wheat in the Taihu region of east China versus irrigated wheat/rainfed maize on the North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–471 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen was little used by succeeding crops in rice/wheat systems compared with wheat/maize systems.

Outcome
utilization of residual N by the succeeding crope0
Direction
littlee0
Comparator
wheat/maize systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher N loss rates and lower N retention rates indicate little utilization of residual N by the succeeding crop in rice/wheat systems in comparison with wheat/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periodic waterlogging caused large nitrogen losses through denitrification in the Taihu region.

Taxon
rice/upland wheate1
Treatment
Periodic waterlogging of upland systemse0
Outcome
N losses by denitrificatione0
Direction
largee0
Setting
Taihu regione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Periodic waterlogging of upland systems caused large N losses by denitrification in the Taihu region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“waterlogged rice/upland wheat in the Taihu region of east China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–409 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia volatilization was a main nitrogen loss pathway for wheat at 19%.

Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0
Value
19%e0
Setting
wheat/maize systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonia volatilization (19% for wheat and 24% for maize) and nitrate leaching being the main N loss pathways in wheat/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia volatilization was a main nitrogen loss pathway for maize at 24%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0
Value
24%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonia volatilization (19% for wheat and 24% for maize) and nitrate leaching being the main N loss pathways in wheat/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate leaching was a main nitrogen loss pathway in the wheat/maize system.

Outcome
nitrate leachinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonia volatilization (19% for wheat and 24% for maize) and nitrate leaching being the main N loss pathways in wheat/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atmospheric deposition and irrigation water nitrogen increased more than twofold and became important nitrogen sources to agricultural ecosystems.

Taxon
wheat/rainfed maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
atmospheric deposition and irrigation water Ne0
Direction
increasese0
Value
More than 2-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More than 2-fold increases in atmospheric deposition and irrigation water N reflect heavy air and water pollution and these have become important N sources to agricultural ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigated wheat/rainfed maize on the North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–471 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimum nitrogen fertilization, control of loss pathways, and extension-service improvements to improve nitrogen balance without sacrificing yields.

Taxon
rice/upland wheate1
Outcome
adopting optimum N fertilization techniques, controlling the primary N loss pathways, and improving the performance of the agricultural Extension Servicee0

Verbatim

e0

“A better N balance can be achieved without sacrificing crop yields but significantly reducing environmental risk by adopting optimum N fertilization techniques, controlling the primary N loss pathways, and improving the performance of the agricultural Extension Service”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1691 · show in text ↑
e1

“waterlogged rice/upland wheat in the Taihu region of east China versus irrigated wheat/rainfed maize on the North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–471 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.