Paper · 2011 · 46th Croatian and 6th International Symposium on Agriculture, Opatija, Croatia, 14-18 February 2011. Proceedings

Controlling microbial infection by managing grapevine canopy.

Melita Sternad Lemut; Paolo Sivilotti; Lorena Butinar; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pinots (Vitis vinifera L.) are known as tight-clustered grape varieties, where the mechanical pressure of adjacent berries may disrupt cuticle waxes, thus predisposing these sites to greater incidences of infection. One of the main causes of crop quality degradation is grape rot due to the development of various microorganisms (bacteria, yeasts or other fungi). Among them Botrytis cinerea is one of the most frequent problems. Because mold spores are ubiquitous, the control of germination and growth in the vineyard by use of fungicides may only be part of the solution. Therefore, carefully selected cultural practices may play a significant role toward encouraging or discouraging mold and other microbial infections. A field trial was established in Pinot Noir vineyard of Vipava Valley for two consecutive years. Preliminary results based on visual examination of microbial compromised grapes indicated that earlier leaf removal treatments reduced the extent of microbe damage on grape. Therefore in the following harvest three different treatments of leaf removal (at pre-flowering, berry-set and veraison phase of grape development) were performed, using untreated vines as a control. Temperature and humidity data were collected in the grape area of all treatments. Microbial population on grapes was followed using standard cultivation methods during ripening and at harvest time as well as visual inspection of damaged / sound grapes was performed at both times. At harvest time compactness of grapes was also evaluated. Parallel trial with excluding last Switch® application was done to evaluate the effect in different treatments. In general we observed the change in species composition on the surface of grapes with early predominance by the basidiomycetous yeasts and species Aureobasidium pullulans, and at harvest time with the prevalence of the ascomycetous yeasts, lactic / acetic acid bacteria and molds. Leaf removal was much more effective against Botrytis Cinerea compering to additional Switch® application, especially at leaf removals at earlier stages. Pre-flowering leaf removal also showed significant reduction of grape compactness. The results suggesting early leaf removals as successful tool for reducing the risk of microbial infections.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal was more effective than additional Switch® application against Botrytis cinerea, especially at earlier leaf removal stages.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Leaf removale0
Interactor
Botrytis CinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
effective against Botrytis Cinereae0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
especially at leaf removals at earlier stagese0
Comparator
additional Switch® applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Controlling microbial infection by managing grapevine canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf removal was much more effective against Botrytis Cinerea compering to additional Switch® application, especially at leaf removals at earlier stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-flowering leaf removal significantly reduced grape compactness compared with untreated vines.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
Pre-flowering leaf removale0
Outcome
grape compactnesse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated vinese1

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-flowering leaf removal also showed significant reduction of grape compactness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2082–2163 · show in text ↑
e1

“using untreated vines as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier leaf removal treatments reduced the extent of microbe damage on grapes in preliminary visual examination.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
earlier leaf removal treatmentse0
Outcome
extent of microbe damage on grapee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Preliminary results based on visual examinatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary results based on visual examination of microbial compromised grapes indicated that earlier leaf removal treatments reduced the extent of microbe damage on grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–993 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape surface species composition showed early predominance of basidiomycetous yeasts and Aureobasidium pullulans.

Taxon
grapese0
Organ / stage
surface of grapese0
Outcome
species compositione0
Qualifier
early predominance by the basidiomycetous yeasts and species Aureobasidium pullulanse0

Verbatim

e0

“In general we observed the change in species composition on the surface of grapes with early predominance by the basidiomycetous yeasts and species Aureobasidium pullulans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1817 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, grape surface species composition showed prevalence of ascomycetous yeasts, lactic / acetic acid bacteria and molds.

Taxon
grapese1
Organ / stage
surface of grapese1
Outcome
species compositione1
Qualifier
at harvest time with the prevalence of the ascomycetous yeasts, lactic / acetic acid bacteria and moldse0

Verbatim

e0

“and at harvest time with the prevalence of the ascomycetous yeasts, lactic / acetic acid bacteria and molds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1926 · show in text ↑
e1

“the change in species composition on the surface of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1727 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early leaf removals are a successful tool for reducing the risk of microbial infections in grapevine.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
early leaf removalse0
Outcome
risk of microbial infectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Controlling microbial infection by managing grapevine canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results suggesting early leaf removals as successful tool for reducing the risk of microbial infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2165–2272 · show in text ↑

pruning · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · Botrytis cinerea · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.