Paper · 2006 · Annals of Agricultural Research

INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS ON FORAGE PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMICS OF OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.)

Sunil Kumar; Shiva Dhar

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiement was conducted at Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute during Rabi seasons of 1996-97 to 1998-99 to access the productivity and economics of forage oat with the combined use of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients. The treatments comprised of vermicompost 10 t/ha, FYM 10 t/ha, 100% recommended dose of NPK (80:40:0), vermicompost 5 /ha, FYM 5 t/ha, 50% recommended dose of NPK + vermicompost 5 t/ha, 50% recommended dose of NPK + FYM 5 t/ha, 50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/ha gave significantly higher green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields of oat than the other treatments. The forage yield exhibited superiority with the treatments where growth parameters attained maximum values. However, the results of forage and crude protein yield were comparable with 100% recommended dose of NPK. Highest net return (Rs. 11575/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.60) was obtained with 100% recommended dose of NPK and was significantly higher than best treatment with regard to forage and crude protein yields i.e. 50% recommended dose of NPK + vermincompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/ha (1.14).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined half NPK, vermicompost and FYM treatment gave significantly higher green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields than other treatments.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/hae0
Outcome
green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/ha gave significantly higher green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields of oat than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–660 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage yield was superior where growth parameters attained maximum values.

Treatment
treatments where growth parameters attained maximum valuese0
Outcome
forage yielde0
Direction
superioritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The forage yield exhibited superiority with the treatments where growth parameters attained maximum values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage and crude protein yields were comparable to the full recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/hae1
Outcome
forage and crude protein yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
100% recommended dose of NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results of forage and crude protein yield were comparable with 100% recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–551 · show in text ↑
e2

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended NPK dose produced the highest net return, Rs. 11575/ha.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of NPKe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
Rs. 11575/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net return (Rs. 11575/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.60) was obtained with 100% recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended NPK dose produced the highest benefit:cost ratio of 2.60.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of NPKe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
2.60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net return (Rs. 11575/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.60) was obtained with 100% recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The full NPK dose had significantly higher economic returns than the combined half NPK treatment.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of NPKe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1.14e0
Comparator
50% recommended dose of NPK + vermincompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net return (Rs. 11575/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.60) was obtained with 100% recommended dose of NPK and was significantly higher than best treatment with regard to forage and crude protein yields i.e. 50% recommended dose of NPK + vermincompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/ha (1.14)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–180 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.