Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined half NPK, vermicompost and FYM treatment gave significantly higher green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields than other treatments.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS ON FORAGE PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMICS OF OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.) · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined half NPK, vermicompost and FYM treatment gave significantly higher green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields than other treatments.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/hae0
Outcome
green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% recommended dose of NPK (40:20:0) + vermicrompost 5 t/ha + FYM 5 t/ha gave significantly higher green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields of oat than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–660

Title

INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS ON FORAGE PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMICS OF OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.)

Sunil Kumar; Shiva Dhar Annals of Agricultural Research 2006

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bfd79bea5d9d93de64b95b9ac2f8df321ca49c37846502a38d8f400f08fce0c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.