Paper · 2008 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Studies on uptake of N, P and K as influenced by different rates (doses) of pretilachlor in transplanted rice

DEEPA S; JAYAKUMAR R

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in wetlands of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during rabi, 2001-02 and summer, 2002 to study the effect of weed control treatments on nutrient uptake by crop and removal by weeds and their impact on yield. Pretilachlor at five levels (0.5, 0.75,1.0,1.5 and 3.0 kg ha-1) were compared with anilofos (0.4 kg ha-1), butachlor (1.25 kg ha-1) and pretilachlor (Rifit) (0.75 kg ha-1) as well as the farmers’ practice of two manual weeding and un weeded control. Nutrient uptake by crop and removal by weeds were recorded at active tillering, panicle initiation and at harvest stage. The results revealed that pretilachlor at 3.0 kg ha-1 resulted in reduced nutrient depletion by weeds and was comparable with pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1. Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1 recorded maximum nutrient uptake by crop and remained comparable with pretilachlor at 0.75 kg ha-1 and hand weeding twice and thereby grain yield of rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor at 3.0 kg ha-1 reduced nutrient depletion by weeds, comparable to 1.0 kg ha-1.

Treatment
pretilachlor at 3.0 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
nutrient depletion by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“pretilachlor at 3.0 kg ha-1 resulted in reduced nutrient depletion by weeds and was comparable with pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1 produced maximum crop nutrient uptake.

Treatment
Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
pretilachlor at 0.75 kg ha-1 and hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1 recorded maximum nutrient uptake by crop and remained comparable with pretilachlor at 0.75 kg ha-1 and hand weeding twice and thereby grain yield of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1 gave comparable rice grain yield.

Treatment
Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
pretilachlor at 0.75 kg ha-1 and hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretilachlor at 1.0 kg ha-1 recorded maximum nutrient uptake by crop and remained comparable with pretilachlor at 0.75 kg ha-1 and hand weeding twice and thereby grain yield of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–963 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Pretilachlor · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.