Paper · 1990 · Agricultural and Food Science

Conventional and organic cropping systems at Suitia I: Experimental design and summaries

Asko O. Hannukkala; Jukka Korva; Eeva Tapio

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of four conventional and four organic cropping systems on the crop yield and yield quality, on the microbial activity of soil, on weeds, plant diseases, insect pests and earthworms were compared in a field experiment on the Suitia Experimental Farm in Southern Finland in 1982—1988. In the conventional cropping systems, industrial fertilisers and chemical pesticides were used according to practices adopted on actual farms in Southern Finland. In the organic cropping systems, plant nutrition was based on biological N fixation by legumes and organic manures. No chemical pesticides were used. The average yield of barley in organic cropping varied between one quarter and half of that in conventional cropping. The yields of winter wheat, oats and potato were about 40 % of those obtained conventionally. The yields of clover-grass leys in organic farming were similar to those of grass-leys in the conventional system. Unfortunately, the clover-grass leys outwintered after the first year. The primary reason for the poor crop growth in the organic cropping systems was apparently the acute N deficiency caused by poor performance of legumes, low N content of organic manures and N losses in anaerobic conditions often occurring during winter and early spring. Pronounced soil compaction and anaerobic conditions in organic cropping systems had a harmful effect on the microbiological activity of soil as well as on earthworms. Weeds, plant diseases and insects were not a remarkable problem in any of the cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic barley yield was one quarter to half that of conventional barley.

Treatment
organic croppinge0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
one quarter and halfe0
Value
one quarter and halfe0
Comparator
conventional croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield of barley in organic cropping varied between one quarter and half of that in conventional cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic winter wheat yield was about 40% of conventional yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
40 %e0
Comparator
conventionallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of winter wheat, oats and potato were about 40 % of those obtained conventionally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic oat yield was about 40% of conventional yield.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
40 %e0
Comparator
conventionallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of winter wheat, oats and potato were about 40 % of those obtained conventionally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic potato yield was about 40% of conventional yield.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
40 %e0
Comparator
conventionallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of winter wheat, oats and potato were about 40 % of those obtained conventionally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic clover-grass ley yields were similar to conventional grass ley yields.

Taxon
clover-grass leyse0
Treatment
organic farminge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
grass-leys in the conventional systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of clover-grass leys in organic farming were similar to those of grass-leys in the conventional system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover-grass leys outwintered after the first year.

Taxon
clover-grass leyse0
Outcome
outwinterede0
Qualifier
after the first yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“the clover-grass leys outwintered after the first year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1005 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acute nitrogen deficiency apparently explained poor organic crop growth.

Taxon
croppingt0
Compound
Ne0
Outcome
poor crop growthe0
Qualifier
poor performance of legumes, low N content of organic manures and N losses in anaerobic conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The primary reason for the poor crop growth in the organic cropping systems was apparently the acute N deficiency caused by poor performance of legumes, low N content of organic manures and N losses in anaerobic conditions often occurring during winter and early spring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds, plant diseases and insects were not remarkable problems in either cropping system.

Taxon
croppingt0
Outcome
not a remarkable probleme0

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds, plant diseases and insects were not a remarkable problem in any of the cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 · show in text ↑