Paper · 2009 · Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University/Journal of research Pubjab Agricultural University

Effect of mulch and drip irrigation on soil hydrothermal regime and potato yield(Solanum tuberosum L.)

Amanpreet Kaur Chawla; Kulbir Singh; Angrej Singh

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to observe the effect of mulch and drip irrigation on quality of potato (Solatium tuberosum L.). The different types of mulch were plastic, biodegradable and organic. The different drip irrigation levels were low (LDI), medium (MDI) and high (HDI) with 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 IW/CPE ratio respectively and conventional irrigation. Plastic mulch increased the minimum soil temperature by 2–3°C and brought it to an optimum range (10–12°C) required for better crop growth, which helped in improving quality of crop. The average yield of all the three mulch treatments under drip irrigation was 28.6 per cent higher than the no mulch drip irrigation treatment. The highest yield of 312.3 q/ha was obtained under HDI treatment (averaged over all mulches) against a yield of 238.7 q/ha obtained for the conventionally irrigated mulched treatment, registering an increase of 30.8 per cent. Mulch also helped in improving the processing quality of the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased minimum soil temperature by 2–3°C to 10–12°C.

Treatment
Plastic mulche0
Outcome
minimum soil temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2–3°Ce0
Qualifier
10–12°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic mulch increased the minimum soil temperature by 2–3°C and brought it to an optimum range (10–12°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across drip irrigation levels, mulch treatments averaged 28.6% higher potato yield than no-mulch drip irrigation.

Treatment
all the three mulch treatments under drip irrigatione0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
28.6 per cente0
Comparator
no mulch drip irrigation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average yield of all the three mulch treatments under drip irrigation was 28.6 per cent higher than the no mulch drip irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High drip irrigation yielded 312.3 q/ha averaged over mulches, 30.8% more than conventionally irrigated mulched potato at 238.7 q/ha.

Treatment
HDI treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
312.3 q/hae0
Qualifier
238.7 q/hae0
Comparator
conventionally irrigated mulched treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yield of 312.3 q/ha was obtained under HDI treatment (averaged over all mulches) against a yield of 238.7 q/ha obtained for the conventionally irrigated mulched treatment, registering an increase of 30.8 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch improved potato processing quality.

Treatment
Mulche0
Outcome
processing qualitye0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch also helped in improving the processing quality of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.