Paper · 2009 · Biologia Plantarum

The mitigating role of environmental factors in seedling injury and chill-dependent depression of catalase activity in maize leaves

R. Bączek-Kwinta; J. Kościelniak

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In pot experiments performed on maize seedlings chilled at 5 °C, leaf injury was diminished by the application of elevated temperature (1 or 5 h at 15 or 20°C, "warm breaks" treatment) in a dose-dependent manner. The lower the injury count, the higher the catalase (CAT) activity. In a separate experiment, the application of 100 % relative humidity also protected the plants from chilling injury and water loss, increased their gas exchange and variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm), but did not influence CAT activity. Another protective environmental factor, elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration [700 µmol(CO2) mol-1(air)] diminished CAT activity inhibition, but only in plants of chilling-resistant cultivar. The positive impact of specific environmental factors accompanying chilling is not obviously related to the suppression of the inhibition of CAT activity, although the enzyme is considered as chilling-sensitive.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm breaks reduced leaf injury in chilled maize seedlings in a dose-dependent manner.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated temperature (1 or 5 h at 15 or 20°C, "warm breaks" treatment)e0
Outcome
leaf injurye0
Direction
diminishede0
Qualifier
chilled at 5 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize seedlings chilled at 5 °C, leaf injury was diminished by the application of elevated temperature (1 or 5 h at 15 or 20°C, "warm breaks" treatment) in a dose-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower injury counts coincided with higher CAT activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
injury counte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower the injury count, the higher the catalase (CAT) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–279 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High relative humidity protected plants from chilling injury and water loss.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100 % relative humiditye0
Outcome
chilling injury and water losse0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100 % relative humidity also protected the plants from chilling injury and water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High relative humidity increased gas exchange and Fv/Fm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100 % relative humiditye0
Outcome
gas exchange and variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100 % relative humidity also protected the plants from chilling injury and water loss, increased their gas exchange and variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High relative humidity did not influence CAT activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100 % relative humiditye0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100 % relative humidity also protected the plants from chilling injury and water loss, increased their gas exchange and variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm), but did not influence CAT activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced CAT activity inhibition only in chilling-resistant plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration [700 µmol(CO2) mol-1(air)]e0
Outcome
CAT activity inhibitione0
Direction
diminishede0
Qualifier
only in plants of chilling-resistant cultivare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration [700 µmol(CO2) mol-1(air)] diminished CAT activity inhibition, but only in plants of chilling-resistant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protection by the tested factors was not clearly tied to suppression of CAT inhibition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
specific environmental factorse0
Outcome
suppression of the inhibition of CAT activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The positive impact of specific environmental factors accompanying chilling is not obviously related to the suppression of the inhibition of CAT activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–131 · show in text ↑

heat · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

humidity · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

humidity · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

co2 · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.