Abstract
During 2004-2007, a field survey was conducted in different vineyards to determine the fungal pathogens associated with grapevine decline in different provinces of Iran including Fars, Hamedan, Isfahan, and Kohgiluyeh and Boirahmad. Twenty-seven isolates of Botryosphaeriaceae were recovered from vines showing decline and dieback symptoms only in Fars Province. Based on morphological and cultural characters along with molecular analysis [partial sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), beta-tubulin (BT), and elongation factor 1-α (EF)], two species of Botryosphaeriaceae, namely, Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum were identified. Both species were pathogenic on rooted cuttings of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and caused the dieback and drying-out of leaves as well as extended lesions on the shoots 4 months after inoculation. Results showed that N. parvum isolates were the most virulent and produced significantly longer lesions than those caused by D. seriata. Both species were reisolated from the margin of the lesions completing Koch's postulates.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Twenty-seven Botryosphaeriaceae isolates were recovered from symptomatic vines only in Fars Province.
- Interactor
- BotryosphaeriaceaeBotryosphaeriaceaee0pathogen
- Outcome
- isolates of Botryosphaeriaceae were recovered from vines showing decline and dieback symptomse0
- Value
- Twenty-sevene0
- Setting
- Fars Provincee0
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Twenty-seven isolates of Botryosphaeriaceae were recovered from vines showing decline and dieback symptoms only in Fars Province.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Diplodia seriata was identified among the grapevine decline isolates.
- Interactor
- Diplodia seriataDiplodia seriatae0pathogen
- Outcome
- Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum were identifiede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two species of Botryosphaeriaceae, namely, Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum were identified.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Neofusicoccum parvum was identified among the grapevine decline isolates.
- Interactor
- Neofusicoccum parvumNeofusicoccum parvume0pathogen
- Outcome
- Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum were identifiede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two species of Botryosphaeriaceae, namely, Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum were identified.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Diplodia seriata caused leaf dieback, drying and shoot lesions on rooted Cabernet Sauvignon cuttings after four months.
- Material
- cv. Cabernet Sauvignone0
- Treatment
- inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Diplodia seriataDiplodia seriatat0pathogene0
- Outcome
- dieback and drying-out of leaves as well as extended lesions on the shootse0
- Value
- 4 monthse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both species were pathogenic on rooted cuttings of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and caused the dieback and drying-out of leaves as well as extended lesions on the shoots 4 months after inoculation.”
t0“Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum Associated with Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Neofusicoccum parvum caused leaf dieback, drying and shoot lesions on rooted Cabernet Sauvignon cuttings after four months.
- Material
- cv. Cabernet Sauvignone0
- Treatment
- inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Neofusicoccum parvumNeofusicoccum parvumt0pathogene0
- Outcome
- dieback and drying-out of leaves as well as extended lesions on the shootse0
- Value
- 4 monthse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both species were pathogenic on rooted cuttings of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and caused the dieback and drying-out of leaves as well as extended lesions on the shoots 4 months after inoculation.”
t0“Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum Associated with Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
N. parvum produced significantly longer lesions than D. seriata.
- Treatment
- N. parvum isolatese0
- Interactor
- N. parvumNeofusicoccum parvume0pathogen
- Second interactor
- D. seriataDiplodia seriatae0pathogen
- Outcome
- lesionse0
- Direction
- longere0
- Comparator
- D. seriatae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N. parvum isolates were the most virulent and produced significantly longer lesions than those caused by D. seriata.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Both pathogen species were reisolated from lesion margins.
- Outcome
- reisolated from the margin of the lesionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both species were reisolated from the margin of the lesions completing Koch's postulates.”
t0“Grapevine”
The same questions in other papers
Neofusicoccum parvum · disease · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
inoculation · Diplodia seriata · VitisPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · Neofusicoccum parvum · VitisPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.