Paper · 2011 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Bio-efficacy of fenazaquin 10 EC against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. (Acari: Tetranychidae) in tomato

H. P. Misra

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted at the Central Research Station Farm, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar during winter seasons of 2008-09 and 2009-10, using tomato variety ???Arka Vikas??? to test the bio-efficacy of fenazaquin 10EC against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. The results revealed that fenazaquin at 125 and 150 g a.i./ha registered significantly lowest mite population (3.5-4.8/4 cm2 leaf area) followed by dicofol at 250g a.i./ha at 10 days after spraying (DAS) during both the years of study. The highest population reduction was achieved (90.27-92.13%) with fenazaquin at 125-150g a.i./ha followed by dicofol at 250g a.i./ha and fenazaquin at 100g a.i./ha (76.40-76.81 %) compared to control. Plots receiving fenazaquin at 125 and 150g a.i./ha treatments recorded significantly highest fruit yield (18.9-19.2 t/ha) which was 30.0-32.1per cent more than control (14.5 t/ha). The selectiveness and safety of fenazaquin to predatory phytoseiid mites was observed at all doses evaluated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenazaquin at 125 and 150 g a.i./ha gave the lowest mite population at 10 days after spraying in both years.

Treatment
fenazaquin at 125 and 150 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
mite populatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.5-4.8/4 cm2 leaf areae0
Comparator
dicofol at 250g a.i./hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenazaquin at 125 and 150 g a.i./ha registered significantly lowest mite population (3.5-4.8/4 cm2 leaf area) followed by dicofol at 250g a.i./ha at 10 days after spraying (DAS) during both the years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tetranychus urticae Koch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenazaquin at 125-150g a.i./ha achieved 90.27-92.13% population reduction relative to control.

Treatment
fenazaquin at 125-150g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet1pest
Outcome
population reductione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90.27-92.13%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest population reduction was achieved (90.27-92.13%) with fenazaquin at 125-150g a.i./ha followed by dicofol at 250g a.i./ha and fenazaquin at 100g a.i./ha (76.40-76.81 %) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tetranychus urticae Koch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicofol at 250g a.i./ha and fenazaquin at 100g a.i./ha followed the higher fenazaquin doses in population reduction, at 76.40-76.81% relative to control.

Treatment
dicofol at 250g a.i./ha and fenazaquin at 100g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaet1pest
Outcome
population reductione1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
76.40-76.81 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by dicofol at 250g a.i./ha and fenazaquin at 100g a.i./ha (76.40-76.81 %) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tetranychus urticae Koch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest population reduction was achieved (90.27-92.13%) with fenazaquin at 125-150g a.i./ha followed by dicofol at 250g a.i./ha and fenazaquin at 100g a.i./ha (76.40-76.81 %) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenazaquin at 125 and 150g a.i./ha produced the highest fruit yield, 18.9-19.2 t/ha, 30.0-32.1per cent above control.

Treatment
fenazaquin at 125 and 150g a.i./hae0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.9-19.2 t/hae0
Qualifier
30.0-32.1per cent more than control (14.5 t/ha)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenazaquin at 125 and 150g a.i./ha treatments recorded significantly highest fruit yield (18.9-19.2 t/ha) which was 30.0-32.1per cent more than control (14.5 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tetranychus urticae Koch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenazaquin was selective and safe for predatory phytoseiid mites at all tested doses.

Interactor
predatory phytoseiid mitese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
selectiveness and safety of fenazaquin to predatory phytoseiid mitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The selectiveness and safety of fenazaquin to predatory phytoseiid mites was observed at all doses evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tetranychus urticae Koch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑

dicofol · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenazaquin · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenazaquin · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.