Abstract
Different integrated management modules were evaluated for the control of Tetranychus urticae (Koch) on tomato grown under polyhouse cultivation at the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessaraghatta, Bangalore. Results indicated that application of module 2 (abamectin followed by wettable sulphur and abamectin) was most effective (1.23–2.08 mites per leaf) in controlling the T. urticae followed by module 1 (dicofol folfowed by wettable sulphur and dicofol) (4.05–4.23 mites per leaf) and module 3 (dicofol followed by pongamiaoil and neem seed kernal extract (4.68–4.80 mites per leaf) in first two trials (Sept. 2002-Mar. 2003 and Jun. 2003-Dec. 03). However, during third trial (Mar. 2004-Sept. 2004) all the revised modules viz., spray of dicofol followed by wettable sulphur and dicofoo (M1), abamectin followed by fenazaquin and abamectin (M2), fenazaquin followed by neem seed powder extract and oxymetrin (M3) including organic module oxymetrin followed by neem soap and pongamia oil (M4) were significantly superior.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Module 2 was most effective in the first two trials, with 1.23–2.08 mites per leaf.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- module 2 (abamectin followed by wettable sulphur and abamectin)e0
- Interactor
- T. urticae
.jpg?width=60)
Tetranychus urticaee0pest - Outcome
- mites per leafe0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Value
- 1.23–2.08 mites per leafe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“application of module 2 (abamectin followed by wettable sulphur and abamectin) was most effective (1.23–2.08 mites per leaf) in controlling the T. urticae”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Module 1 followed module 2 in efficacy, with 4.05–4.23 mites per leaf.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- module 1 (dicofol folfowed by wettable sulphur and dicofol)e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus UrticaeTetranychus urticaet1pest
- Outcome
- mites per leafe0
- Value
- 4.05–4.23 mites per leafe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“module 1 (dicofol folfowed by wettable sulphur and dicofol) (4.05–4.23 mites per leaf)”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tetranychus Urticae”
Claim · model-written summary
Module 3 had 4.68–4.80 mites per leaf in the first two trials.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- module 3 (dicofol followed by pongamiaoil and neem seed kernal extracte0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus UrticaeTetranychus urticaet1pest
- Outcome
- mites per leafe0
- Value
- 4.68–4.80 mites per leafe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“module 3 (dicofol followed by pongamiaoil and neem seed kernal extract (4.68–4.80 mites per leaf)”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tetranychus Urticae”
Claim · model-written summary
Revised module M1 was significantly superior in the third trial.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- spray of dicofol followed by wettable sulphur and dicofoo (M1)e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus UrticaeTetranychus urticaet1pest
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spray of dicofol followed by wettable sulphur and dicofoo (M1), abamectin followed by fenazaquin and abamectin (M2), fenazaquin followed by neem seed powder extract and oxymetrin (M3) including organic module oxymetrin followed by neem soap and pongamia oil (M4) were significantly superior.”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tetranychus Urticae”
Claim · model-written summary
Revised module M2 was significantly superior in the third trial.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- abamectin followed by fenazaquin and abamectin (M2)e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus UrticaeTetranychus urticaet1pest
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“abamectin followed by fenazaquin and abamectin (M2), fenazaquin followed by neem seed powder extract and oxymetrin (M3) including organic module oxymetrin followed by neem soap and pongamia oil (M4) were significantly superior.”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tetranychus Urticae”
Claim · model-written summary
Revised module M3 was significantly superior in the third trial.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fenazaquin followed by neem seed powder extract and oxymetrin (M3)e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus UrticaeTetranychus urticaet1pest
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fenazaquin followed by neem seed powder extract and oxymetrin (M3) including organic module oxymetrin followed by neem soap and pongamia oil (M4) were significantly superior.”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tetranychus Urticae”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic module M4 was significantly superior in the third trial.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- organic module oxymetrin followed by neem soap and pongamia oil (M4)e0
- Interactor
- Tetranychus UrticaeTetranychus urticaet1pest
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“organic module oxymetrin followed by neem soap and pongamia oil (M4) were significantly superior.”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tetranychus Urticae”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
dicofol · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fenazaquin · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
abamectin · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →botanical · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.