Paper · 2010 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

MANAGEMENT OF ROOT MEALYBUGS, Geococcus spp. IN BANANA CV. NENDRAN

M. S. Smitha; M. P. Mathew

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil ameliorants, botanicals, chemical insecticides and fungal bio-agents were screened against banana root mealybug, Geococcus spp. Among the soil ameliorants, application of sodium silicate and calcium oxide at the time of planting effectively reduced the population of root mealybug. Drenching of neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) @ 3 % at monthly intervals was superior to neem cake, neem oil and pongamia oil. The entomopathogenic fungus, Cephalosporium lecanii Zimmerman was the best among the three fungi screened. At five months after planting, C. lecanii recorded 1.95 colonies per sample followed by Hirsutella sp. (2.25 / sample) and the control recorded 5.70 per sample. Among the synthetic chemicals, drenching chlorpyriphos (0.05%) at monthly intervals @ 2.5 ml l-1 effectively reduced the root mealybug population and was found to be the best treatment. Field experiment conducted with the best treatment in each of the category and their combinations revealed that, almost all treatment combinations containing chlorpyriphos caused maximum reduction of root mealybug. Among the combinations without synthetic insecticides, sodium silicate (S) alone and its combination with NSKE and C. lecanii (SNV) were effective in reducing the mealybug population at sixth and seventh month of the crop. Application of chlorpyriphos gave the highest benefit cost ratio of 2.46 followed by sodium silicate (2.30).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate and calcium oxide reduced mealybug population.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
sodium silicate and calcium oxidee0
Interactor
root mealybuge0pest
Outcome
population of root mealybuge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of sodium silicate and calcium oxide at the time of planting effectively reduced the population of root mealybug.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly NSKE drenching surpassed neem cake, neem oil and pongamia oil.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
Drenching of neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) @ 3 % at monthly intervalse0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
neem cake, neem oil and pongamia oile0

Verbatim

e0

“Drenching of neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) @ 3 % at monthly intervals was superior to neem cake, neem oil and pongamia oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cephalosporium lecanii was best among screened fungi.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
Cephalosporium lecanii Zimmermane0
Interactor
Cephalosporium lecanii ZimmermanAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
beste0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
three fungi screenede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · InteractorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The entomopathogenic fungus, Cephalosporium lecanii Zimmerman was the best among the three fungi screened.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. lecanii yielded 1.95 colonies per sample at five months.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
C. lecaniie0
Interactor
C. lecaniiAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
colonies per samplee0
Value
1.95 colonies per samplee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · InteractorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At five months after planting, C. lecanii recorded 1.95 colonies per sample followed by Hirsutella sp. (2.25 / sample) and the control recorded 5.70 per sample.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hirsutella had 2.25 colonies per sample.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
Hirsutella sp.e0
Interactor
Hirsutella sp.Hirsutellae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
colonies per samplee1
Value
2.25 / samplee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hirsutella
Hirsutella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)New Zealand Fungarium - Te Kohinga Hekaheka o Aotearoa · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hirsutella sp. (2.25 / sample) and the control recorded 5.70 per sample.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“At five months after planting, C. lecanii recorded 1.95 colonies per sample followed by Hirsutella sp. (2.25 / sample) and the control recorded 5.70 per sample.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly chlorpyriphos reduced mealybugs and was best among chemicals.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
drenching chlorpyriphos (0.05%) at monthly intervals @ 2.5 ml l-1e0
Interactor
root mealybuge0pest
Outcome
root mealybug populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“drenching chlorpyriphos (0.05%) at monthly intervals @ 2.5 ml l-1 effectively reduced the root mealybug population and was found to be the best treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most chlorpyriphos combinations maximally reduced mealybugs.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
treatment combinations containing chlorpyriphose0
Interactor
root mealybuge0pest
Outcome
root mealybuge0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“almost all treatment combinations containing chlorpyriphos caused maximum reduction of root mealybug.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate alone reduced mealybugs at months six and seven.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
sodium silicate (S) alonee0
Interactor
mealybuge0pest
Outcome
mealybug populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sodium silicate (S) alone and its combination with NSKE and C. lecanii (SNV) were effective in reducing the mealybug population at sixth and seventh month of the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate with NSKE and C. lecanii reduced mealybugs at months six and seven.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
combination with NSKE and C. lecanii (SNV)e0
Interactor
mealybuge0pest
Second interactor
C. lecaniiAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mealybug populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · Second interactorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its combination with NSKE and C. lecanii (SNV) were effective in reducing the mealybug population at sixth and seventh month of the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.46.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
chlorpyriphose0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.46e0
Comparator
sodium silicatee0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chlorpyriphos gave the highest benefit cost ratio of 2.46 followed by sodium silicate (2.30).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.30.

Taxon
BANANAt0
Treatment
sodium silicatee0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Value
2.30e0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chlorpyriphos gave the highest benefit cost ratio of 2.46 followed by sodium silicate (2.30).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA CV. NENDRAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · yield · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · pest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorpyrifos · pest · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · pest · MusaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · pest · MusaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.