Paper · 2020 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Evaluation of insecticdes and non-edible oils against Banana stem weevil

D Srinivas Reddy; C Madhumati; R Nagaraju

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The banana pseudostem weevil (BPW) Odoiporus longicollis (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Curculiondae) is a serious pest of banana. An experiment was conducted with cultivar Rasthali having eleven treatments during 2016 and 2017 to evaluate some insecticides and non-edible oils/cakes against BPW. The results revealed that except mahua and castor oil cakes@ 1 kg/plant along with fertilizer application all others gave reduction in damage, and number of life stages of BPW. The injection of botanicals (2% neem oil) at monthly interval from 5−8th month led to more damage as compared to injection of insecticides namely, 2% monocrotophos 36SL and chlorpyriphos 20EC at monthly intervals from 5–8th month. The use of carbofuran 3G@ 750mg ai/plant in soil at 0, 2nd, and 5th month followed by leaf axil application @375mg ai/plant at 7th month and carbofuran 3G @ 375mg ai/plant at 5th, 6th and 7th month in leaf axil resulted in minimum damage and reduction in life stages of weevil, indicating that these could be recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested treatments reduced weevil damage and life stages, except mahua and castor oil cakes.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
all otherse0
Interactor
BPWe0pest
Outcome
damage, and number of life stages of BPWe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“except mahua and castor oil cakes@ 1 kg/plant along with fertilizer application all others gave reduction in damage, and number of life stages of BPW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil injection caused more damage than monocrotophos and chlorpyriphos injection.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
2% neem oile0
Interactor
stem weevilt0pest
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
2% monocrotophos 36SL and chlorpyriphos 20ECe0

Verbatim

e0

“The injection of botanicals (2% neem oil) at monthly interval from 5−8th month led to more damage as compared to injection of insecticides namely, 2% monocrotophos 36SL and chlorpyriphos 20EC at monthly intervals from 5–8th month”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana stem weevil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil and leaf axil carbofuran schedule minimized weevil damage and life stages.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
carbofuran 3G@ 750mg ai/plante0
Interactor
weevile0pest
Outcome
damage and reduction in life stages of weevile0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“carbofuran 3G@ 750mg ai/plant in soil at 0, 2nd, and 5th month followed by leaf axil application @375mg ai/plant at 7th month and carbofuran 3G @ 375mg ai/plant at 5th, 6th and 7th month in leaf axil resulted in minimum damage and reduction in life stages of weevil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended the carbofuran schedules.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
these could be recommendede0

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that these could be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · MusaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.