Paper · 2009 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Effect of Manuring with Oilcake based Vermicompost on incidence of Red Spider Mite in Okra Crop

Tulsi Mahto; R.P. Yadav

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among treatments, vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1 & 4.5:0.5 ratios) at 1.0 kg/pot recorded relatively low mite infestation throughout the crop stand. Extent of reduction in mite infestation due to manuring with vermicomposts varied widely from 8.3 to 27.1 to 39.8, 11.7 to 51.0, 4.7 to 26.8, 5.6 to 55.7, 15. to 43.0 and 12.1 to 84.8% zat 55, 62, 69, 76, 81, 88 and 95 DAS, respectively over unmanured control. It was maximum due to manuring with vermicomposts from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 1.0 kg/pot. Daily rate of population change (RPC) of red spider mite on okra plant in ascending phase between 55–62 DAS recorded the lowest and highest values of 0.18 and 0.74 in case of manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 0.5 kg/pot and without manuring, respectively. In declining phase from 69 DAS onwards, it was at faster rate in case of manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1 or 4.5:0.5) at 1.0 kg or 0.5 kg/pot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung and neem cake vermicompost at 1.0 kg/pot gave relatively low mite infestation.

Treatment
vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1 & 4.5:0.5 ratios) at 1.0 kg/pote0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
mite infestatione0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1 & 4.5:0.5 ratios) at 1.0 kg/pot recorded relatively low mite infestation throughout the crop stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost manuring reduced mite infestation relative to unmanured control, with reduction ranges varying by date.

Treatment
manuring with vermicompostse0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
mite infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
55, 62, 69, 76, 81, 88 and 95 DASe0
Comparator
unmanured controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extent of reduction in mite infestation due to manuring with vermicomposts varied widely from 8.3 to 27.1 to 39.8, 11.7 to 51.0, 4.7 to 26.8, 5.6 to 55.7, 15. to 43.0 and 12.1 to 84.8% zat 55, 62, 69, 76, 81, 88 and 95 DAS, respectively over unmanured control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung and neem cake vermicompost at 4:1 and 1.0 kg/pot maximized reduction in mite infestation.

Treatment
manuring with vermicomposts from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 1.0 kg/pote0
Interactor
mitee1pest
Outcome
reduction in mite infestatione1
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was maximum due to manuring with vermicomposts from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 1.0 kg/pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in mite infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest ascending-phase daily mite population change rate was 0.18 under 4:1 vermicompost at 0.5 kg/pot.

Treatment
manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 0.5 kg/pote0
Interactor
red spider mitee0pest
Outcome
Daily rate of population change (RPC) of red spider mitee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.18e0
Qualifier
55–62 DASe0
Comparator
without manuringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daily rate of population change (RPC) of red spider mite on okra plant in ascending phase between 55–62 DAS recorded the lowest and highest values of 0.18 and 0.74 in case of manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 0.5 kg/pot and without manuring, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without manuring the ascending-phase daily mite population change rate was highest at 0.74.

Interactor
red spider mitee0pest
Outcome
Daily rate of population change (RPC) of red spider mitee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.74e0
Qualifier
without manuringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daily rate of population change (RPC) of red spider mite on okra plant in ascending phase between 55–62 DAS recorded the lowest and highest values of 0.18 and 0.74 in case of manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1) at 0.5 kg/pot and without manuring, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mite population decline from 69 DAS was faster with cow dung and neem cake vermicompost.

Treatment
manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1 or 4.5:0.5) at 1.0 kg or 0.5 kg/pote0
Interactor
red spider mitee1pest
Outcome
red spider mitee1
Direction
faster ratee0
Qualifier
69 DAS onwardse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In declining phase from 69 DAS onwards, it was at faster rate in case of manuring with vermicompost from cow dung + neem cake (4:1 or 4.5:0.5) at 1.0 kg or 0.5 kg/pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“red spider mite on okra plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–590 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

botanical · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.