Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The other two botanical extracts did not significantly reduce flea beetle populations but were better than the control.

A claim from EVALUATION OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF FIVE PLANTS IN THE CONTROL OF FLEA BEETLES ON OKRA (ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS (L.) MOENCH · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The other two botanical extracts did not significantly reduce flea beetle populations but were better than the control.

Treatment
other two botanicalse4
Outcome
population of the pestse4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
controle4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598
e4

“Though the other two botanicals were notsignificant in reducing the population of the pests, they were better than thecontrol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1433

Title

EVALUATION OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF FIVE PLANTS IN THE CONTROL OF FLEA BEETLES ON OKRA (ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS (L.) MOENCH

Onunkun O Journal of Biopesticides 2012. doi:10.57182/jbiopestic.5.0.62-67

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-06fa2d28a7b6d4ae046c06ad348dd1f1d9706d1a618f0d683c79f418c6305b16 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

botanical · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.