Paper · 2023 · Scientific Reports

The nematicidal potential of novel fungus, Trichoderma asperellum FbMi6 against Meloidogyne incognita

Ritul Saharan; J. A. Patil; Saroj Yadav; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract One of the most damaging pests in vegetable crops is the root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita ) worldwide. The continuous use of nematicide is costly and has unintended consequences for human and environmental health. To minimize nematicides, eco-friendly integrated nematode management is required. Trichoderma, an antagonistic fungus has been explored to control root-knot nematode. The fungal bio-control strain FbMi6 was identified as Trichoderma asperellum (accession no. MT529846.1). T. asperellum FbMi6 showed substantial nematicidal activity in the laboratory, with egg hatch suppression (96.6%) and juvenile mortality (90.3%) of M. incognita . T. asperellum FbMi6 was examined under pot and field conditions (after neem cake enrichment), both alone and in combination, and compared with controls. Application of T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake (1-ton ha -1 ) increased (28.3%) the okra yield and decreased (57.1%) nematode population as compared with control. T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake had higher polyphenol content (resistance enhancer) in okra compared with inoculated check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal biocontrol strain FbMi6 was identified as Trichoderma asperellum.

Taxon
vegetable cropse1
Interactor
Trichoderma asperellumTrichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
identified as Trichoderma asperellume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungal bio-control strain FbMi6 was identified as Trichoderma asperellum (accession no. MT529846.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum FbMi6 suppressed M. incognita egg hatch by 96.6% in the laboratory.

Treatment
T. asperellum FbMi6e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
T. asperellum FbMi6Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg hatch suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
96.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · Second interactorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. asperellum FbMi6 showed substantial nematicidal activity in the laboratory, with egg hatch suppression (96.6%) and juvenile mortality (90.3%) of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–665 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum FbMi6 caused 90.3% M. incognita juvenile mortality in the laboratory.

Treatment
T. asperellum FbMi6e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
T. asperellum FbMi6Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
juvenile mortalitye0
Value
90.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · Second interactorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. asperellum FbMi6 showed substantial nematicidal activity in the laboratory, with egg hatch suppression (96.6%) and juvenile mortality (90.3%) of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–665 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum-enriched neem cake raised okra yield by 28.3% against control.

Treatment
T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake (1-ton ha -1 )e0
Interactor
T. asperellum FbMi6Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
okra yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake (1-ton ha -1 ) increased (28.3%) the okra yield and decreased (57.1%) nematode population as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum-enriched neem cake cut nematode population by 57.1% against control.

Treatment
T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake (1-ton ha -1 )e0
Interactor
T. asperellum FbMi6Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
57.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake (1-ton ha -1 ) increased (28.3%) the okra yield and decreased (57.1%) nematode population as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum-enriched neem cake gave okra higher polyphenol content than the inoculated check.

Treatment
T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cakee0
Interactor
T. asperellum FbMi6Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
polyphenol contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inoculated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. asperellum FbMi6 enriched neem cake had higher polyphenol content (resistance enhancer) in okra compared with inoculated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1120 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma asperellum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

78 papers: 69 positive, 9 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

botanical · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.