Paper · 2007 · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Antagonistic effects of the endophytic fungus Meira geulakonigii on the citrus rust mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora

Z. Paz; S. Burdman; U. Gerson; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AIMS: The fungus Meira geulakonigii has been shown to reduce populations of citrus rust mite (CRM; Phyllocoptruta oleivora) on citrus leaves and fruits, in both the field and laboratory. However, attempts to isolate the fungus from leaves and fruits have been unsuccessful. The aims of this study were therefore to determine whether M. geulakonigii is a citrus endophyte, and to assess possible mechanisms involved in its mite-antagonist activity. METHODS AND RESULTS: A quantitative real-time PCR and regular PCR approaches were developed to detect M. geulakonigii in both the field and laboratory. The fungus was detected throughout. Different methods revealed that M. geulakonigii is an endophyte, which colonizes both the peel of grapefruits. Applications of conidia protected the grapefruits against CRM, and fungal secretions extracted from growth media caused 100% CRM mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Meira geulakonigii is a beneficial endophyte of grapefruits that colonizes the fruit's peel, and protects it from CRM. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Findings from this study demonstrate the endophytic nature of M. geulakonigii in its interaction with grapefruits. In addition, a molecular approach was developed to specifically detect the fungus inside the grapefruit peel. This approach can be used to assess the natural occurrence of M. geulakonigii in grapefruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR approaches detected M. geulakonigii in field and laboratory material.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Interactor
M. geulakonigiiMeira geulakonigaee0symbiont
Outcome
detect M. geulakonigiie0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A quantitative real-time PCR and regular PCR approaches were developed to detect M. geulakonigii in both the field and laboratory. The fungus was detected throughout.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rust mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. geulakonigii colonized grapefruit peel as an endophyte.

Taxon
grapefruitsCitrus ×paradisie0
Interactor
M. geulakonigiiMeira geulakonigaee0symbiont
Outcome
colonizes both the peel of grapefruitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. geulakonigii is an endophyte, which colonizes both the peel of grapefruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial application protected grapefruits against citrus rust mites.

Taxon
grapefruitsCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
Applications of conidiae0
Interactor
CRMe0pest
Second interactor
Phyllocoptruta oleivoraPhyllocoptruta oleivorae1pest
Outcome
protected the grapefruits against CRMe0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocoptruta oleivora
Phyllocoptruta oleivora · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLumass · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of conidia protected the grapefruits against CRM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“citrus rust mite (CRM; Phyllocoptruta oleivora)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal secretions caused complete citrus rust mite mortality.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
fungal secretions extracted from growth mediae0
Interactor
CRMe0pest
Outcome
CRM mortalitye0
Direction
causede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal secretions extracted from growth media caused 100% CRM mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“citrus rust mite (CRM; Phyllocoptruta oleivora)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–123 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rust mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–112 · show in text ↑

in vitro · pest · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.