Paper · 2014 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Seaweed Extract Provides Development And Production Of Wheat

Carvalho, Marcia Eugenia Amaral; Castro, Paulo Roberto de Camargo; Gallo, Luiz Antonio; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Agricultural crop performance can be improved with use of seaweed extracts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on biometric, biochemical and yield parameters of the wheat. The experimental design was completely randomized with 3 treatments [control (water), seed treatment (0.1 mL of the A. nodosum extract on the 100 g of seeds) and soil irrigation (5 mL L-1of seaweed extract, which was applied at 14th, 28th and 42nd days after sowing)] and 10 replications. Plants irrigated with A. nodosum extract showed increments in the height, dry mass of shoots and number of spikes (10.72%, 22.22% and 13.19%, respectively), however these plants had the lowest harvest index (reduction of 17.12%), when compared to the control. Seed treatment also increased plant height, but it did not change biochemical and productivity parameters. It is concluded that soil irrigation with 5 mL L-1 of A. nodosum extract provides development and positively affects production of ‘IAC 364’ wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with A. nodosum extract increased wheat height by 10.72% versus control.

Material
IAC 364e2
Treatment
A. nodosum extracte0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
10.72%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants irrigated with A. nodosum extract showed increments in the height, dry mass of shoots and number of spikes (10.72%, 22.22% and 13.19%, respectively), however these plants had the lowest harvest index (reduction of 17.12%), when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘IAC 364’ wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with A. nodosum extract increased wheat shoot dry mass by 22.22% versus control.

Material
IAC 364e2
Treatment
A. nodosum extracte0
Outcome
dry mass of shootse0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
22.22%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants irrigated with A. nodosum extract showed increments in the height, dry mass of shoots and number of spikes (10.72%, 22.22% and 13.19%, respectively), however these plants had the lowest harvest index (reduction of 17.12%), when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘IAC 364’ wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with A. nodosum extract increased wheat spike number by 13.19% versus control.

Material
IAC 364e2
Treatment
A. nodosum extracte0
Outcome
number of spikese0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
13.19%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants irrigated with A. nodosum extract showed increments in the height, dry mass of shoots and number of spikes (10.72%, 22.22% and 13.19%, respectively), however these plants had the lowest harvest index (reduction of 17.12%), when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘IAC 364’ wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with A. nodosum extract reduced wheat harvest index by 17.12% versus control.

Material
IAC 364e2
Treatment
A. nodosum extracte0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
17.12%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants irrigated with A. nodosum extract showed increments in the height, dry mass of shoots and number of spikes (10.72%, 22.22% and 13.19%, respectively), however these plants had the lowest harvest index (reduction of 17.12%), when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘IAC 364’ wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment increased wheat height.

Treatment
Seed treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment also increased plant height, but it did not change biochemical and productivity parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment did not change wheat biochemical parameters.

Treatment
Seed treatmente0
Outcome
biochemicale0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment also increased plant height, but it did not change biochemical and productivity parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment did not change wheat productivity parameters.

Treatment
Seed treatmente0
Outcome
productivity parameterse0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment also increased plant height, but it did not change biochemical and productivity parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that soil irrigation with A. nodosum extract supports development and production of IAC 364 wheat.

Material
IAC 364e0
Treatment
soil irrigation with 5 mL L-1 of A. nodosum extracte0
Outcome
provides development and positively affects productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil irrigation with 5 mL L-1 of A. nodosum extract provides development and positively affects production of ‘IAC 364’ wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1021 · show in text ↑

Ascophyllum nodosum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 123 positive, 17 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 270 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.