Abstract
The aim of this research was to analyze the effects of different variants of irrigations and fertilization of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) on the yield of total sugar. The study was performed in agro-ecological conditions in valley Pelagonija in R. of Macedonia in period from 2012 to 2014. The following different regimes of irrigation were applied: irrigation at 75 % utilized available water (uAW); 50 % uAW; 25 % uAW; and irrigation on the basis of bioclimatic coefficient (BC). Control was a variant without irrigation. The fertilization was applied at three different levels: low, medium and high. Control was a non-fertilized variant.This study is very important because simultaneously supplying of sugar beet with water and mineral matters is required for achievement of high and quality yields. The highest yield of total sugar was obtained in a irrigation treatment with 50 % uAW and medium dose of fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 1
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 50 % uAW with medium fertilization gave the highest total sugar yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1 - Treatment
- irrigation treatment with 50 % uAW and medium dose of fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yield of total sugare0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- 2012 to 2014e2
- Setting
- valley Pelagonija in R. of Macedoniae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of total sugar was obtained in a irrigation treatment with 50 % uAW and medium dose of fertilization.”
e1“sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The study was performed in agro-ecological conditions in valley Pelagonija in R. of Macedonia in period from 2012 to 2014.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →in vitro · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.