Paper · 2011 · Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World

Shoreline surveys of oil-impacted marsh in southern Louisiana, July to August 2010

Raymond F. Kokaly; David Heckman; JoAnn Holloway; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This report describes shoreline surveys conducted in the marshes of Louisiana in areas impacted by oil spilled from the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Three field expeditions were conducted on July 7-10, August 12-14, and August 24-26, 2010, in central Barataria Bay and the Bird's Foot area at the terminus of the Mississippi River delta. This preliminary report includes locations of survey points, a photographic record of each site, field observations of vegetation cover and descriptions of oil coverage in the water and on plants, including measurements of the distance of oil penetration from the shoreline. Oiling in Barataria Bay marshes ranged from lightly oiled sections of stems of the predominant species Spartina alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus to wide zones of oil-damaged canopies and broken stems penetrating as far as 19 m into the marsh. For the 34 survey points in Barataria Bay where dimensions of oil damaged zones were measured, the depth of the oil-damaged zone extended, on average, 6.7 m into the marsh, with a standard deviation of 4.5 m. The median depth of penetration was 5.5 m. The extent to which the oil-damaged zone stretched along the shore varied with location but often extended more than 100 m parallel to the shoreline. Oil was observed on the marsh sediment at some sites in Barataria Bay. This oiled sediment was observed both above and a few centimeters below the water surface depending on the level of the tide. Phragmites australis was the dominant vegetation in oil-impacted zones in the Bird's Foot area of the Mississippi River delta. Oiling of the leaves and portions of the thick stems of P. australis was observed during field surveys. In contrast to the marshes of Barataria Bay, fewer areas of oil-damaged canopy were documented in the Bird's Foot area. In both areas, oil was observed to be persistent on the marsh plants from the earliest (July 7) to the latest (August 24) surveys. At sites repeatedly visited in Barataria Bay over this time period, oiled plant stems and leaves, laid over by the weight of the oil, broke and were removed from the vegetation canopy, likely due to tidal action. In these areas, a zone of 2-5 cm high plant stubble remained at the edge of the marsh. Signs of both further degradation and recovery were observed and varied with site. Oil damage to the marsh at some sites resulted in complete reduction of live vegetation cover and erosion of exposed sediments, while other damaged zones had signs of regrowth of vegetation in up to 10 percent of the areal coverage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oiling ranged from lightly oiled Spartina and Juncus stems to damaged canopies up to 19 m inland.

Taxon
Spartina alterniflora and Juncus roemerianusSporobolus alterniflorusJuncus roemerianuse0
Outcome
oil-damaged canopies and broken stemse0
Value
19 me0
Setting
Barataria Bay marshese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oiling in Barataria Bay marshes ranged from lightly oiled sections of stems of the predominant species Spartina alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus to wide zones of oil-damaged canopies and broken stems penetrating as far as 19 m into the marsh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–901 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oil-damaged zone averaged 6.7 m deep at 34 Barataria Bay survey points.

Taxon
marsht0
Outcome
depth of the oil-damaged zonee0
Value
6.7 me0
Qualifier
standard deviation of 4.5 me0
Setting
Barataria Baye0

Verbatim

e0

“For the 34 survey points in Barataria Bay where dimensions of oil damaged zones were measured, the depth of the oil-damaged zone extended, on average, 6.7 m into the marsh, with a standard deviation of 4.5 m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“marsh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The median oil penetration depth was 5.5 m.

Taxon
marsht0
Outcome
depth of penetratione0
Value
5.5 me0

Verbatim

e0

“The median depth of penetration was 5.5 m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“marsh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil-damaged zones often stretched more than 100 m along the shore.

Taxon
marsht0
Outcome
oil-damaged zonee0
Value
more than 100 me0

Verbatim

e0

“The extent to which the oil-damaged zone stretched along the shore varied with location but often extended more than 100 m parallel to the shoreline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“marsh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phragmites australis dominated oil-impacted zones in the Bird’s Foot area.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australise0
Outcome
dominant vegetatione0
Setting
Bird's Foot area of the Mississippi River deltae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phragmites australis was the dominant vegetation in oil-impacted zones in the Bird's Foot area of the Mississippi River delta.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil covered leaves and thick stems of Phragmites australis.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australise1
Organ / stage
leaves and portions of the thick stemse0
Outcome
Oiling of the leaves and portions of the thick stemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oiling of the leaves and portions of the thick stems of P. australis was observed during field surveys.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1731 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phragmites australis was the dominant vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1549 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer oil-damaged canopies were documented in the Bird’s Foot area than in Barataria Bay.

Taxon
marsht0
Outcome
oil-damaged canopye0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
marshes of Barataria Baye0
Setting
Bird's Foot areae0

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast to the marshes of Barataria Bay, fewer areas of oil-damaged canopy were documented in the Bird's Foot area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1851 · show in text ↑
t0

“marsh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil persisted on marsh plants from July 7 through August 24 in both areas.

Taxon
marsh plantse0
Outcome
oil was observed to be persistente0
Qualifier
July 7) to the latest (August 24e0

Verbatim

e0

“In both areas, oil was observed to be persistent on the marsh plants from the earliest (July 7) to the latest (August 24) surveys.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1852–1982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oiled stems and leaves broke and left the canopy at revisited Barataria Bay sites.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
broke and were removed from the vegetation canopye0
Qualifier
likely due to tidal actione0
Setting
Barataria Baye0

Verbatim

e0

“At sites repeatedly visited in Barataria Bay over this time period, oiled plant stems and leaves, laid over by the weight of the oil, broke and were removed from the vegetation canopy, likely due to tidal action.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2–5 cm tall stubble zone remained at the marsh edge.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
plant stubble remainede0
Value
2-5 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“In these areas, a zone of 2-5 cm high plant stubble remained at the edge of the marsh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2282 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some sites lost all live vegetation cover and experienced sediment erosion.

Taxon
marshe0
Outcome
complete reduction of live vegetation cover and erosion of exposed sedimentse0
Qualifier
some sitese0

Verbatim

e0

“Oil damage to the marsh at some sites resulted in complete reduction of live vegetation cover and erosion of exposed sediments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2366–2492 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some damaged zones showed vegetation regrowth covering up to 10 percent of the area.

Taxon
marsht0
Outcome
regrowth of vegetatione0
Value
up to 10 percente0

Verbatim

e0

“other damaged zones had signs of regrowth of vegetation in up to 10 percent of the areal coverage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2598 · show in text ↑
t0

“marsh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑