Paper · 2001 · http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/84820010401.pdf

Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid

Y. Emam; Gholamhassan Ranjbar

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of the present field experiment was to examine how plant density and en-hanced source, i.e. thinning treatments, may affect grain yield and its components for a non-prolific maize hybrid, SC704. The environment of the hybrid maize crop was changed at intervals over its life cycle by removing every other plant in rows equispaced at 75 cm apart with a population of 13.34 plants m-2. The plants were grown with no wa-ter or nutrient restrictions. Results showed that earlier thinning was associated with greater stem, leaf, shoot and ear dry weight accumulation, ear kernel weight (EKW) and kernel number per ear row (KNER). In this ways the greatest of these characteristics were obtained in thinning at sowing i.e. 6.67 plants m-2 throughout. Delay in thinning un-til the 12-leaf stage reduced stem dry weight and EKW significantly. Thinning at tasseling also resulted in significantly lower stem dry weight accumulation compared to thinning at sowing. At final harvest, the stem dry weight of plants thinned at tasseling was 20.47% (P<0.05) lower than those thinned at sowing. Similar effects were found upon delay in thinning until tasseling on leaf, shoot, and ear dry weight accumulation. Delay in thinning until the 12-leaf stage or later, also reduced EKW significantly compared to plants thinned at sowing. This reduction was attributable to decreased KNER and 1000-kernel weight. According to these results, KNER and 1000-KW were found to be yield compo-nents sensitive to light environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier thinning increased stem, leaf, shoot and ear dry weight accumulation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
SC704e1
Treatment
earlier thinninge0
Outcome
stem, leaf, shoot and ear dry weight accumulatione0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“earlier thinning was associated with greater stem, leaf, shoot and ear dry weight accumulation, ear kernel weight (EKW) and kernel number per ear row (KNER).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–638 · show in text ↑
e1

“SC704”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier thinning increased ear kernel weight and kernel number per ear row.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
earlier thinninge0
Outcome
ear kernel weight (EKW) and kernel number per ear row (KNER)e0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“earlier thinning was associated with greater stem, leaf, shoot and ear dry weight accumulation, ear kernel weight (EKW) and kernel number per ear row (KNER).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning at sowing produced the greatest reported growth and yield component characteristics.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
thinning at sowinge0
Outcome
these characteristicse0
Direction
greateste0
Value
6.67 plants m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest of these characteristics were obtained in thinning at sowing i.e. 6.67 plants m-2 throughout.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning delayed to the 12-leaf stage significantly reduced stem dry weight and ear kernel weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Delay in thinning un-til the 12-leaf stagee0
Outcome
stem dry weight and EKWe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delay in thinning un-til the 12-leaf stage reduced stem dry weight and EKW significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning at tasseling reduced final stem dry weight by 20.47% relative to thinning at sowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
thinned at tasselinge0
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20.47%e0
Comparator
thinned at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At final harvest, the stem dry weight of plants thinned at tasseling was 20.47% (P<0.05) lower than those thinned at sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying thinning to tasseling likewise lowered leaf, shoot and ear dry weight accumulation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
delay in thinning until tasselinge0
Outcome
leaf, shoot, and ear dry weight accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar effects were found upon delay in thinning until tasseling on leaf, shoot, and ear dry weight accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning delayed until the 12-leaf stage or later significantly reduced ear kernel weight relative to sowing-time thinning.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Delay in thinning until the 12-leaf stage or latere0
Outcome
EKWe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
plants thinned at sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delay in thinning until the 12-leaf stage or later, also reduced EKW significantly compared to plants thinned at sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower ear kernel weight after delayed thinning was attributed to fewer kernels per ear row and lower 1000-kernel weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
reductione0
Qualifier
decreased KNER and 1000-kernel weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduction was attributable to decreased KNER and 1000-kernel weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel number per ear row and 1000-kernel weight were sensitive to light environment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
KNER and 1000-KWe0
Direction
sensitivee0
Setting
light environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNER and 1000-KW were found to be yield compo-nents sensitive to light environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning as Affected by Thinning in a Non-Prolific Maize Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

63 papers: 29 positive, 34 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.