Paper · 2004 · Agronomy Journal

Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality

Andrew L. Lewis; William J. Cox; Jerome H. Cherney

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids may show different silage quality responses to harvest date and cutting height because hybrids differ in neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility. A brown midrib, leafy, and dual‐purpose hybrid were harvested at early [≈280 g kg −1 dry matter (DM) content], medium (≈350 g kg −1 ), and late (≈420 g kg −1 ) harvest dates at 15‐, 30‐, and 46‐cm cutting heights in 2001 and 2002 to determine optimum harvest management for each hybrid type. Most forage quality characteristics had hybrid × harvest date interactions as indicated by the 73 g kg −1 decrease in NDF digestibility of the brown midrib compared with 20 g kg −1 decreases of the other hybrids between the early and late harvest date. Milk per megagram, a forage quality index, declined (1523, 1487, and 1417 kg Mg −1 ), but DM yields increased (13.2, 13.6, and 14.1 Mg ha −1 ), so calculated milk yields were similar (20333, 20200, and 20233 kg ha −1 ) at early, medium, and late harvest dates, respectively, suggesting a broad optimum DM content for harvest. The sharp decline in NDF digestibility, however, raises concern about harvesting the brown midrib hybrid above 350 g kg −1 DM content. Calculated milk yield had a hybrid × cutting height interaction, as indicated by no change in the leafy hybrid and a 13% decrease in the brown midrib hybrid as cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cm. This suggests that an increase in cutting height may be a good management practice for the leafy hybrid but not for the brown midrib hybrid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDF digestibility of the brown midrib corn hybrid decreased by 73 g kg-1 between the early and late harvest date.

Material
brown midribe1
Treatment
late harvest datee1
Outcome
NDF digestibilitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
73 g kg −1e1
Comparator
earlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the 73 g kg −1 decrease in NDF digestibility of the brown midrib compared with 20 g kg −1 decreases of the other hybrids between the early and late harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDF digestibility of the other corn hybrids decreased by 20 g kg-1 between the early and late harvest date.

Material
other hybridse1
Treatment
late harvest datee1
Outcome
NDF digestibilitye1
Direction
decreasese1
Value
20 g kg −1e1
Comparator
earlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the 73 g kg −1 decrease in NDF digestibility of the brown midrib compared with 20 g kg −1 decreases of the other hybrids between the early and late harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milk per megagram, a forage quality index, declined from 1523 to 1487 to 1417 kg Mg-1 at early, medium and late harvest dates.

Treatment
harvest datese1
Outcome
Milk per megagrame1
Direction
declinede1
Value
1523, 1487, and 1417 kg Mg −1e1
Comparator
earlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Milk per megagram, a forage quality index, declined (1523, 1487, and 1417 kg Mg −1 ), but DM yields increased (13.2, 13.6, and 14.1 Mg ha −1 ), so calculated milk yields were similar (20333, 20200, and 20233 kg ha −1 ) at early, medium, and late harvest dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yields increased from 13.2 to 13.6 to 14.1 Mg ha-1 at early, medium and late harvest dates.

Treatment
harvest datese1
Outcome
DM yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13.2, 13.6, and 14.1 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
earlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Milk per megagram, a forage quality index, declined (1523, 1487, and 1417 kg Mg −1 ), but DM yields increased (13.2, 13.6, and 14.1 Mg ha −1 ), so calculated milk yields were similar (20333, 20200, and 20233 kg ha −1 ) at early, medium, and late harvest dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated milk yields were similar (20333, 20200 and 20233 kg ha-1) at early, medium and late harvest dates.

Treatment
harvest datese1
Outcome
calculated milk yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Value
20333, 20200, and 20233 kg ha −1e1
Comparator
earlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Milk per megagram, a forage quality index, declined (1523, 1487, and 1417 kg Mg −1 ), but DM yields increased (13.2, 13.6, and 14.1 Mg ha −1 ), so calculated milk yields were similar (20333, 20200, and 20233 kg ha −1 ) at early, medium, and late harvest dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The sharp decline in NDF digestibility raises concern about harvesting the brown midrib hybrid above 350 g kg-1 DM content.

Material
brown midrib hybride1
Outcome
harvesting the brown midrib hybrid above 350 g kg −1 DM contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The sharp decline in NDF digestibility, however, raises concern about harvesting the brown midrib hybrid above 350 g kg −1 DM content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated milk yield of the leafy hybrid showed no change as cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cm.

Material
leafy hybride1
Treatment
cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cme1
Outcome
Calculated milk yielde1
Direction
no changee1
Comparator
15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Calculated milk yield had a hybrid × cutting height interaction, as indicated by no change in the leafy hybrid and a 13% decrease in the brown midrib hybrid as cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated milk yield of the brown midrib hybrid decreased by 13% as cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cm.

Material
brown midrib hybride1
Treatment
cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cme1
Outcome
Calculated milk yielde1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
13%e1
Comparator
15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Calculated milk yield had a hybrid × cutting height interaction, as indicated by no change in the leafy hybrid and a 13% decrease in the brown midrib hybrid as cutting height increased from 15 to 46 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An increase in cutting height may be a good management practice for the leafy hybrid.

Material
leafy hybride1
Outcome
increase in cutting height may be a good management practicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in cutting height may be a good management practice for the leafy hybrid but not for the brown midrib hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An increase in cutting height may not be a good management practice for the brown midrib hybrid.

Material
brown midrib hybride1
Outcome
good management practicee1
Qualifier
but not for the brown midrib hybride1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in cutting height may be a good management practice for the leafy hybrid but not for the brown midrib hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid, Maturity, and Cutting Height Interactions on Corn Forage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑

harvest time · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.